VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:06:31 05/06/03 Tue
Author: SurveyGuy (the only vote wasted is one for an idiot or bastard)
Subject: Gore? You're kidding, right? Those who voted for Nadar and Browne were telling the D's and R's that they have given them nothing to vote for. If Nadar dropped out, my guess is that they are too smart to have voted for Gore, but we'll never know. Heck, even TN voters who knew him well voted against him.
In reply to: Scott Tilde 's message, "Yes, you're wasting your vote. Al Gore could very well have been president if not for my hero, Ralph "Kill the Corvair" Nadir - I mean Nader. And if you really don't think that would have made a difference, then you should just stop voting all together - call it a voluntary IQ disability - you might even get a tax break..." on 21:45:35 05/04/03 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> "[Naderites] are too smart to have voted for Gore." Why risk it? 300 Florida Naderites could have swung the pendulum. And being that they're a pretty confused lot to begin with (check out Nader's platform sometime), they could easily have switched. You're not throwing away your vote on a sure loser only if you truly don't care which major wins. If you really think Gore and Bush are the same, you're just plain insane. You besmirch the Libertarians with that logic. -- Scott "Results Matter" Tilde, 13:13:59 05/07/03 Wed


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> I truly didn't care. I figure that I lose either way, so I vote for what I want, not for what I don't want. Now THAT would be a waste of a vote. If others would do the same, we might actually get what we want. I will say that if Hillary Clinton runs in 2004, I will vote for Bush. Some consequences are too terrible to contemplate. -- SurveyGuy, 16:38:17 05/07/03 Wed


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Whew. Thank You! We all have our limits. -- Scott Tilde, 23:42:11 05/12/03 Mon


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> This "the R's are better then the D's" argument always bores me. It's like someone running around telling me how much better off I'll be if I get burglarized instead of being robbed. Sure, its less risky to be burglarized, but I loose in both cases! Save your "Bush is better" for your next meeting of the RNC while you all sit around praising the Patriot Act. -- richiep, 00:24:20 05/08/03 Thu


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Bitter Bitter Bitter. So logic bores you: then just be honest with yourself and vote D next time. You'll "feel" better. It's really all the same. Sweden's just like the U.S. -- Scott "Explaining The Obvious Bores Me Too" Tilde, 23:50:21 05/12/03 Mon


[ Edit | View ]




[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.