VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:16:42 02/06/03 Thu
Author: David Howells
Subject: Comments on TV to Lawyer RE: Michael Jackson

The lawyer made the comment that "Michael Jackson's behaviour was innapropriate for a man of his age" and that that was enough of a reason for someone to look into the whole situation of his sleeping with young children (unrelated to him). Her point is completely valid. It is completely irrelevent wether she is related to, is a best friend of, or has never met Michael Jackson. Her point still stands. I am amazed that someone whose very career makes her a 'center of attention' (and appears to jump at any opportunity for self promotion) could possibly accuse anyone else of doing something for media attention.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.