<font face=arial color=teal size=-1>Note that Fisk is described as "highly respected" and yet he is but a propagandist, not much different from the CNN crowd. I guess it takes very little to be respected these days. </font> -- The Philadelphia Talk Radio Politics and Opinion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:03:52 04/20/03 Sun
Author: SurveyGuy
Author Host/IP: pcp01422563pcs.lndsd201.pa.comcast.net / 68.81.153.209
Subject: Note that Fisk is described as "highly respected" and yet he is but a propagandist, not much different from the CNN crowd. I guess it takes very little to be respected these days.
In reply to: William 's message, "Got to be politically correct, you know. It is fashionable to blame the US for everything. Don't blame the real cuplrits, in this case, the rabid masses of Iraqis with no respect and no self control!

Hey, Fisk, and all you other Arab and European anti-American liars, instigators, excuse makers, and placaters, wake up! Stop covering for the thugs. The US is not to blame for Iraqis and other Arab idiots! Blame them for their own lack of self control and for their rabid behavior. In the mean time, kiss my ass you idiots!" on 19:43:02 04/20/03 Sun

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Well put, SurveyGuy. "respected" my left foot! Propagandist IS more like it! I don't understand what motivates these propagandists. Do you? If there were no more Great Britain and no more US, there would be a lot less "free speech" and a lot less "freedom". There would be more oppression and abuse and people would wish and pray that the US and Great Britain were still around to defend freedom and oppose fascism, Islamofascism, communism, socialism, etc. It won't be appreciated until it is gone. -- William, 20:17:57 04/20/03 Sun (cache-dl04.proxy.aol.com/205.188.209.40)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Just to put you right, William. Tony Blair regards himself as a Socialist. To qoute from the Labour Party website "�The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many, not the few. Where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe. And where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect.� -- Chris Henry, 06:39:50 04/21/03 Mon (NoHost/82.47.215.137)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> In contrast, Chirac occupies a similar part of the political spectrum to Bush. To quote Dick Morris of "The Hill", "Chirac is a man of the right. Elected by a coalition of Gaullists and neo-Gaullists, he has always cast himself as the adversary of socialism and the apostle of free markets". It's a complicated world when socialists support a war on Iraq and conservatives oppose it! -- Chris Henry, 07:32:55 04/21/03 Mon (NoHost/82.47.215.137)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> In Europe, liberal and conservative seem to mean the opposite of what they do here. "Socialism" has been so distorted that its meaning is no longer understood by those who speak or hear the term. In fact, socialism is closer to what is now called "capitalism." Strange indeed. What we call capitalism has been getting closer to "state capitalism" year by year. But what's in a name? -- SurveyGuy, 09:15:05 04/21/03 Mon (pcp01422563pcs.lndsd201.pa.comcast.net/68.81.153.209)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]