what a load of rubbish, you can't backtrack now Irishdaz, and as for the Micheal Jackson input he got NOT GUILTY Sean Gavan is GUILTY you should have used Gary Glitter as an example and look where he is, an outcast no one will give him the time of day his career is over thank god -- For the love of the dance

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, May 18 2026, 20:09:52 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, Sep 20 2007, 20:11:43
Author: parent
Subject: what a load of rubbish, you can't backtrack now Irishdaz, and as for the Micheal Jackson input he got NOT GUILTY Sean Gavan is GUILTY you should have used Gary Glitter as an example and look where he is, an outcast no one will give him the time of day his career is over thank god
In reply to: Irishdaz - LAST POST! 's message, "he was open and he appeared well liked, that is simply a fact. I said maybe he had something to offer, but that doesn't mean I condone his personal actions. I wish i hadn't said anything as everyone seems intent on trying to twist what I have said. the only difference in our opinion of this man and his crimes is that I can separate the man from the organisation, whereas others can't. That does not make either side wrong. This situation is similar (not idebtical) to watching Eastenders (or the BBC) when Dirty Den was in the cast. leslie grantham was convicted of a vicious Murder, a crime equally heinous. I assume that no-one watches the BBC because they allowed him to appear, and promote the programme despite knowing his crimes. I assume that nobody buys any CD's published by Michael jackson's record company as they still promote his wares, despite his history of chuild abuse. no doubt you separate the men from the organisation" on Thu, Sep 20 2007, 19:56:11

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> So actually getting NOT GUILTY in a court really means that he was completely innocent? Get real...he had the money and the adulation to side step the conviction and it will always be with him....not that he cares, he's still free to do whatever he does behind his 'mask' of innocence! He is a seriously deranged and troubled individual, who I'm ashamed to say I was madly in love with when I was 14!! -- a mum, Thu, Sep 20 2007, 20:29:55 [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> sorry you miss by point I agree with you about MJ, but what I am trying to say that Sean Gavan has a conviction so we should be even more all the more concerned that he is working with children. -- parent, Thu, Sep 20 2007, 20:47:46 [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]