Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tuesday, April 29, 11:26:26pm

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: They sure are. Author: Wade A. Tisthammer [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 07/14/04 5:24pm In reply to: Ben 's message, "Alernate explanations are easy to create" on 07/14/04 4:15pm >>>It's not my "uncle," no. But there is no doubt it is >>>related to me. Darwin first figured it out, and then >>>modern science, particularly DNA comparison, has >>>verified it. >> >>Has it? We've found similarities to be sure. But >>there are different interpretations of the data here. >>One alternate explanation: similar biological >>structures (as DNA) for similar functions. A TI-85 >>and a TI-86 graphing calculator have numerous >>similarities. Nonetheless, that doesn't imply that >>they evolved from a common ancestor. > >Here's another alternate explanation: maybe an apple >fell from a tree and, when it hit the ground, >instantly turned into an ape. And maybe, in another >place, an orange fell, but the orange turned into a >human when it hit the ground. Alternate explanations >are easy to find, but science looks for the _most >likely_ scenario True, but ID doesn't look nearly as implausible to me as an orange instantly turning into an ape. >As we've gone over and over on this >board, our common ancestry with apes is supported by >various branches of science, and is by far the best >interpretation of the evidence as a whole. That's a bit open to debate. Note, for instance, the apparently dismal track record regarding fossils and human evolution. >So you can think that an invisible creator created all >these things with the _appearance_ of being related to >each other when they actually aren't And you can think that nature using invisible and unknown processes created life with the _appearance_ of being designed when they actually aren't. (Indeed, the term "designoid" has been coined to describe this.) You see, I can play the same game too. Who said the creator was invisible anyway? Modern ID theory does not make any claims about the designer. We can tell if something is designed even if we don't know by whom. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Damoclese rides again Damoclese 07/14/04 8:04pm Welcome back Kemosabe -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 07/15/04 9:31pm Design? -- Damoclese, 07/16/04 8:18am Disputable points -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:38pm I don't think that Ben 07/15/04 12:57am Okay. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 07/15/04 10:11pm That's simply science -- Damoclese, 07/16/04 8:31am You old softy. -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:43pm Harding Place -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 11:56am A rock...quite a bit more stable than hominid fossils -- Wade A. Tisthamjmer, 09/13/04 12:09am More on Deceptive Design Theory -- Ben, 07/16/04 3:05pm What's deceptive about it? -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 5:57pm here's why -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 7:21pm That's not what I was referring to -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/12/04 11:51pm And a little more -- Damoclese, 07/18/04 7:08pm And more -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 08/12/04 6:04pm When were the laws of Mathematics started? And why? And how? -- QUITTNER, 08/13/04 1:30pm reality check -- Duane, 08/23/04 1:05am Re: reality check -- QUITTNER, 08/30/04 12:55pm Duane -- grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr....., 08/31/04 7:25am Interesting "explanations" -- QUITTNER, 08/31/04 1:37pm whoops... -- Duane, 08/31/04 10:25pm Interesting explanations -- QUITTNER, 09/ 3/04 2:28pm Why post at all? -- Ben, 09/ 3/04 7:10pm I agree -- Duane, 09/ 7/04 7:51am ...of little substance -- Damoclese, 08/15/04 12:01pm Ingoring the substance -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/13/04 12:17am Hitting the Bottle -- Damoclese, 09/13/04 1:23am Of substance -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/14/04 3:48pm Substance abuse -- Damoclese, 09/14/04 10:29pm One quick comment -- Duane, 09/13/04 10:20am One quick reply -- Wade A. Tisthammer, 09/14/04 4:06pm A strange admission... -- Duane, 09/14/04 4:59pm