[> Subject: All I know is that the willing-to-pays are a bigger mess then I could’ve ever imagined. So far I’ve seen 2 different girls with photographed at home headshots. And geez, do they look “DIY”… Embarrassing. If they aren’t willing to shell out a few hundred dollars for some decent photos, I’m only beginning to imagine the outfits and performance we are about to receive. I know damn well they won’t pay for a coach.
[> [> Subject: While I do think ‘at large’ can be a positive move for the larger MAO, it will attract two different type of candidates. Either the ones that get ‘close’ to securing the limited amounts of crowns available, or the candidate that jumps on the chance with ZERO experience/limited exposure. Don’t know the specific girls, but this seems to be the case in USA system and feedback from other MAO/state programs. Just a shame that they don’t also ‘receive’ some sort of guidance/mentor (after paying > fee), to help them acclimate to competition; the week; and knowledge we take for granted by way of prior participation.
[> [> Subject:I 100% agree, they're a mess! You couldn't pay me to go to Methsfield & watch those prelims. There are going to be Sherri Hill Couture gowns next to clearance rack JC Penney. Don't get me wrong a beautiful gown can be found on clearance & I've seen some ugly SH's but not the point. These girls clearly have no idea what they’re doing & no one to guide them or they just don't care. There are so many girls that have competed & done well that still live in Ohio that I'm sure SO could find some that live nearby these girls & to mentor them for even one afternoon & then on FT & text if they have questions. What I definitely do not understand is that if they can afford to buy in then why can't they afford to put money toward the competition?
