[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]6789 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:07
Author: ketch - 7 April 2002
Subject: Re: The Christ Child
In reply to: Dwayanu - 7 April 2002 's message, "Re: The Christ Child" on 12:05

If you put your replies under the post which you are replying to it makes it much easier for everyone to follow the thread.

Once again you try to shift the subject on to my beliefs. I have not made any statements as to what I believe in this matter as my beliefs are completely irrelevant. We are talking about Paulsen's claims that a human baby "The Christ Child" was born at the New Year 1960/1961. This is a human baby with a human mother. I have already given some quotations from Paulsen's book to show that this is what he meant. You have failed to refute those quotations, or to provide any evidence that Paulsen meant something different.

Here is a little more.

It is 1952 and Paulsen is having one of his "revelations" (i.e. fantasies) about his alien friends.

Yes, the next generation would contain the beginnings of an invasion by the Forces of Light. The return of The Builders was now in progress. Jesus, an elder brother of this divine force, would fulfill his promised return.

Paulsen is not speaking here of some inner mystical experience, but of the physical return to Earth of "The Builders" and the physical return of Jesus. This return of the alien race known as "The Builders" is the dominant theme to Paulsens book.

We are now 50 years further on and the return of "The Builders" has not been noticed by anyone except Paulsen. Similarly "The Christ Child" which Paulsen describes as a human baby born at the New Year 1960/1961 has not made himself generally known.

Once again, Paulsen writes of a human birth. If he has changed the meaning in his later books that just shows how unreliable Paulsen's "revelations" are.

If Paulsen was not writing of a human birth in Sunburst then show us where this is made clear.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.