Renaissance - is that the Elizabethan period? Michael Pretorius, I must make a note of that. I used to histen to Purcell a lot. A little later period? -- Eddie Pedantic Gasbag Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:23:45 06/23/01 Sat
Author: spoot
Subject: Renaissance - is that the Elizabethan period? Michael Pretorius, I must make a note of that. I used to histen to Purcell a lot. A little later period?
In reply to: gumtree(referent obscurantes maximus est) 's message, "...incidentally, you had made mention that a certain period of history was your favorite - I majored in Renaissance and Interregnum Britain. The recording Im listening to is from the Virgin "Veritas Edition" - David Munrow and the Early Music Consort of London playing Michael Praetorius (1571-1621) - Dances from Terpsicore and Motets. I recommend it highly, if youre into it." on 01:13:02 06/23/01 Sat

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I think the album I used to have was Purcell's "The Moor's Pavanne" (NT) -- spoot, 01:39:33 06/23/01 Sat
- Yes, Renaissance covered the Tudors entirely...Interregnum was Charles I (the Unfortunate), Cromwell and that lot...Purcell was more in the period after the Glorious Revolution, where William of Orange was invited to become King of England, once everyone got thoroughly fed up with the Stuarts trying to re-establish Rome as the Head of the Church in England. (NT) -- gumtree (heading for bed), 02:08:42 06/23/01 Sat
If I can work it out, praps I can send you a sound bite sometime soon.... (NT) -- gumtree, 02:13:12 06/23/01 Sat
- Okay thanks, nighty nite! (NT) -- spoot, 02:29:18 06/23/01 Sat