At a 90 day grace, OL should had been in the 3 yr old division. -- Pageant Predictions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:16:10 03/18/02 Mon
Author: Anonymous
Subject: At a 90 day grace, OL should had been in the 3 yr old division.

OL should had competed in the 3 year old division even with C. Benton giving a 90 day grace.
OL birthday is December 17th, the pageant officially started on the 16th of March.
OL competed in the wrong age division no matter how you look at it, one day over or one month and one day over.

Did anyone see how T. Pabst stormed in the ballroom?
Guess her feathers were ruffled a bit when she realized she got taken in by this director, then again the child that won the 5 & up Grand was UNTOUCHABLE!!
T.Pabst sometimes things do not just go the way you set it up with the directors, now do they?
Fixed wins, in the past for your kid as well as others and now you got your clients lying to be put in the wrong age divison.
Your portrayed caring and honesty is about as fake as almost everything you do and say in your life.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I think you need to redo your math instead of coming on here and writing accusations that AREN'T true. If (by your own date of Dec 17) that is OL's birthday then on March 16, she would have been 3 for 89 days, so DID indeed make the new fallback. I don't personally agree that the fallback should have been changed, but I don't think it is fair for you to come on here screaming and shouting things that just aren't facts! (NT) -- Anonymous, 09:24:30 03/18/02 Mon
- What? No smart comeback? Maybe you now realize that you were incorrect??? You know an apology would be nice after you came on here and blasted them! (NT) -- Anonymous, 10:17:14 03/18/02 Mon
  - Well????? Still waiting!!! You sure were quick to jump to your own conclusions but now don't have the balls to admit you were wrong!!! (NT) -- Anonymous, 06:34:17 03/19/02 Tue

Forum timezone: GMT-7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.