VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678910 ]
Subject: Re: Forgotten anniversaries


Author:
mark farmer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 19:51:00 05/11/15 Mon
In reply to: Wes 's message, "Forgotten anniversaries" on 14:34:02 05/11/15 Mon

We are overwhelmed by 'entertainment & abbreviated' history lessons. Hogan's Heros is better known than the majority of the 8th Army Air Force flight crews dying over Germany before the magic '30th' was reached.
Now, in our age of hurry up & just the high points, we depend on raconteurs to lead us into the twilight of days worth remembering, & the critical why.
Absent Friend is one my favorite tales. That look back is right. We owe it to ourselves, to the absent.



>Another column picked up from the paper. I was
>going to post this last week but I got sidetracked.

>
>I spend a fair amout of time following the national
>news, mostly on the Internet, and then mostly because
>I can pick and choose which stories interest me,
>rather than hearing more useless stuff about the
>Karadashians, which doesn't strike me as news at all.
>
>At least catching news on the Internet allows me to
>avoid some of the more obnoxious television
>commercials, although the popups and addons in the
>Internet are getting to be just about as irritating
>and useless.
>
>But I digress.
>
>Several times in the past few days I've been impressed
>about things that haven't made the news, or if they
>have, they're barely been mentioned.
>
>For example, last Thursday, April 30, was the 70th
>anniversary of Hitler's death, one of the important
>landmarks of the twentieth century. I saw a grand
>total of one story on the subject.
>
>I did see a couple of very brief mentions of April 12
>being the anniversary of FDR's death, but that was
>about it.
>
>The only lesson I can draw out of that is that neither
>Hitler nor Roosevelt mean much of anything to most
>people, especially those in the news media.
>
>April 15 was the one hundred fiftieth anniversary of
>Lincoln's death. Barely a mention on the news. I did
>see a little more coverage of the anniversary of Lee's
>surrender at Appomatox Court House, but only because I
>know a Civil War re-enactor who was there and had to
>report on the interesting time he had.
>
>Yeah, but that was the Civil War, a hundred and fifty
>years ago, so who cares?
>
>How about a more recent landmark date: April 12, 1955,
>sixty years ago, when Dr. Jonas Salk announced that
>field trials of the polio vaccine were a huge success?
>I'm just barely old enough to remember it. You have to
>be at least as old as I am to remember the annual fear
>that came when polio season arrived -- but not a
>mention of the commemoration of this event did I see
>in the news. Yet, those of us in those days learned an
>important lesson, one that appears to have disappeared
>from the common sense of people today.
>
>It's all in the past, and I guess that means in this
>so-called modern day and age the past doesn't mean
>much of anything any more. Philosopher George
>Santayana is remembered for saying, "Those who cannot
>remember the past are condemned to repeat it." He is
>right, but there aren't many people who remember who
>Santayana was. He was in the past, after all, so
>therefore irrelevant.
>
>I guess I'm just being crabby and in a bad mood. We
>are all results of what happened in the past, and we
>wouldn't be here if the past had not happened.
>
>I for one think that knowledge and respect of where we
>came from and what happened in the past are important.
>Granted, things are changing, and what was important
>to us or to our ancestors, sixty or seventy or a
>hundred and fifty years ago may not have a great deal
>of relevance to us today. But still, there is some
>relevance, some lessons learned by our ancestors that
>we would do well to take to heart.
>
>Now, all that said, May 8 -- Friday -- is the
>seventieth anniversary of V-E Day, the day World War
>II ended in Europe. Naturally, I've seen very little
>news coverage of this story except for some minor
>stories out of Europe, where the story probably had
>more impact than in the US in 1945, where we used to
>celebrate VJ Day on August 16 -- not that we do any
>more. After all, it's in the past, and not relevant to
>people in the modern world.
>
>Or is it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: Forgotten anniversaries


Author:
Leo Kerr
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:11:35 05/11/15 Mon

Because of where I work, I had heard about the anniversaries of Lincoln's death, and the Salk vaccine. I think I had heard somewhere about the Civil War surrender; not sure if it was conversation or what.

VE got note in DC given the overflight. Not that I realized until later it was just a part of a ceremony at the WWII memorial..

History is.. oddly challenging. In high school and college, I was not required to take any "world history" classes. High school had two years of "American History" that were a vague, fast highlights tour of.. well, sort of about 1750-1950. And a big chunk of "here's how to take one of the state mandated tests for graduation." (HS class of 1990, before the big heaps of "high stakes testing.")

My various history classes were either superficial or made deadly by the instructor. Some instructors.. get tired. 30 years of teaching American History and Government to bored teenagers? Yeah, right.

My most interesting history lessons were actually in middle school English classes, when one of the regular substitute teachers basically ignored any lesson plans, hand-outs, or anything like that, and talked about his experiences in Europe in the early 1940s. I can't remember if he was infantry or artillery in the Battle of the Bulge. But that was about it.

Later, I've read more histories, but they're (a) books, and (b) very narrow. I just finished an interesting one on the influence of photography on astronomy and what became "astrophysics," from, what, about 1780 to 1932.

I guess from my perspective: how do you teach history? Or, rather, how *should* you teach history?

Leo


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.