VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678910 ]
Subject: The Birdwatcher Hill Fire - letting small fires burn


Author:
Shadowhawk
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 04:13:22 12/14/15 Mon

Chapter 7:

Fighting forest fires is a specialized business, with no small number of conflicting philosophies and interests involved. Generally speaking, the DNR’s policy was to let small fires of natural causes burn themselves out to lessen the fuel loading in the woods and allow natural succession to take place. Fire is, after all, one of the forces of nature, and it’s part of the way that forests renew themselves. Andy didn’t particularly agree with that policy, for he knew very well that small fires, if left uncontrolled, have a way of turning into big ones. He admitted regularly that the “let it burn” philosophy was at least partly driven by fire-fighting budgets that had been getting tighter and tighter each year, since other things seemed to have a larger demand on the limited amount of state dollars available. That meant that he only had limited of resources to throw at a fire.

Actually, according to the article in Scientific American that I have read, fighting every small forest fire makes for accumulation of fuel (for fuel loading, as it was said), and for gigantic fires that get out of control.

Though controlled burn of small fires would be a better idea, if resources allows...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: The Birdwatcher Hill Fire - letting small fires burn


Author:
Jon
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:54:27 12/17/15 Thu

>Fighting forest fires is a specialized business, with
>no small number of conflicting philosophies and
>interests involved.

FWIW, "The Daily Reporter" out of Milwaukee had a story about Wisconsin DNR will decommission fire watcher towers:

DNR fires up plans to decommission old lookout towers (UPDATE)
By: Alex Zank, alex.zank@dailyreporter.com December 17, 2015 2:11 pm

The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources announced plans Wednesday to discontinue using the fire lookout towers it has scattered throughout the state after finding that they cost more than they're worth.


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.