Keith: it's not quanity - it's quality. I've seen Brown, Elliott, M. Blackshear and Ingram play. Brown is easily the cream of that group. You need to look historically at how Temple has achieved success according to how it stacked up along the front line. There are warning signs that most everyone is missing. -- Temple Owls Basketball Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:52:09 03/08/02 Fri
Author: Lansing
Author Host/IP: pool-151-197-22-77.phil.east.verizon.net / 151.197.22.77
Subject: Keith: it's not quanity - it's quality. I've seen Brown, Elliott, M. Blackshear and Ingram play. Brown is easily the cream of that group. You need to look historically at how Temple has achieved success according to how it stacked up along the front line. There are warning signs that most everyone is missing.
In reply to: Keith90 's message, "How many PF's do we need? He would have to sit out a year and would still have 3 years of eligibility but if Ingram, Blackshear or Elliot develop he may not get his PT when he is eligible in 2003-2004. Although, if he wants to come it would be hard to turn down a bluechip player." on 12:56:46 03/08/02 Fri

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Lansing, I miss your board and insightful articles. Please elaborate on the warning signs that most of us are missing. (NT) -- NYCOwl, 12:35:21 03/10/02 Sun
- I was intentionally vague on that point because I'd be more comfortable discussing this after the season is officially over. I have a ton of material to share on the Owls' recent past, present affairs and potential future, and I'll do that here if this board shows enough life in the near future. (NT) -- Lansing, 17:06:20 03/10/02 Sun
  - I think this board has an uphill battle. With the season we just had and an NIT berth, interest in the program will not be peaking. Nonetheless, I will remain optimistic about someday reading your commentary. BTW, what do you think of our match up with Fresno? (NT) -- NYCOwl, 12:23:46 03/11/02 Mon
    - I haven't seen Fresno this season and don't know what to expect. My concern is whether the Owls will be into this enough to compete at a high level... (NT) -- Lansing, 16:06:01 03/12/02 Tue
I haven't seen all of them play (specifically I haven't seen Blackshear or Ingram) but based on what I have seen of Brown I have no doubt he is the best of the bunch. My concern was ..... (see inside) -- Keith90, 12:28:50 03/11/02 Mon
- A couple points... -- Lansing, 00:20:34 03/12/02 Tue
  - More Responses Inside -- Keith90, 14:49:42 03/12/02 Tue
    - RE: More Responses Inside -- Lansing, 16:01:01 03/12/02 Tue
      - Lynn Greer!! (NT) -- Keith90, 16:08:24 03/12/02 Tue
        Wasn't Greer the Pennsylvania Player of the Year as a senior? -- Lansing, 20:18:28 03/12/02 Tue
        Response Inside -- Keith90, 11:28:53 03/13/02 Wed
      - They think Robinson is a 3. We only have 3 PFs (plus I think Elliot may play some backup C as well). We would have 4 PFs if we brought in Brown, that was my initial point. Sorry about responding in two seperate posts. (NT) -- Keith90, 16:21:48 03/12/02 Tue