Tamarisk Did You Ever Get THAT Correctly! -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:20:26 12/31/02 Tue
Author: Sola Scriptura
Subject: Tamarisk Did You Ever Get THAT Correctly!
In reply to: tamarisk 's message, "Sola" on 13:59:33 12/30/02 Mon

Just breezed on through the Fowler's attempt to
'splain the "gap theory." I suspect, if you take a way
his Dake, the Fake, study bible, he would be incapable
of cogent thought. BINGO!!! For every single word of original commentary the bedroom jangler offers up of his own, he embezzles a thousand words from others and brazenly claims credit for them. And the contrast between the two styles he posts is more vulgar than the difference between the "Deuterocanonical" Apocrypha, "Judith" and the Book of John!

Is that mad-man a hoot, or what? He actually thinks we will read his pilfered cut and pasted excrement. No way, Jose. I would no more read his excrement than I would read Anton LeVey's writings! They come from the same spirit. The difference is that one knows who his god is, and the other who claims to be a set apart special "anointed" is actually a dangerous wolf in sheepskin. In Dake's Annotated Bible, of which Jack clams to like his in leather - - LOL&L&L - - Dake has a 14 dispensation scheme with lengthy descriptions of a pre-Adamite world ruled by Lucifer. STOP. ALLOW THAT TO SINK IN, FOLKS! Dake has a 14 dispensation scheme with lengthy descriptions of a pre-Adamite world ruled by Lucifer. H-E-L-L-O-O-O-O!

Creation to Dake and his cult followers like the pfake bedroom bishop, Jack Howell, and Ken Copeland, Benny Hinn, et al is known as "re-creation" and is explained by a rather lengthy gap theory (see notes on Genesis chapter 1, and the chart at the rear of the Dake), including "Lucifer's flood."

While this study Bible is Arminian to the extreme, and is constantly harping on believers losing their salvation, which is perhaps why Jack thinks he must work so hard at retaining his salvation, probably the most extreme heresy concerns the nature and person of God Himself. Jack likes to deny the truth, but the fact is; On page 280 of the New Testament, Dake has a lengthy discussion of the Trinity. In this discussion, Dake teaches that there are three distinct persons with bodies in the Trinity, and that each one of these also has His own soul and spirit. I have a copy of Jack Howell quoting some of this heresy and acting like it was from his own words. Now he is doing the back stroke and mis-representing both Dake and Jack's own past representations of same. What a gutter viper! There are many other heresies and ridiculous positions held by Dake, and the more ridiculous the position, the more stringently he attempts to "prove" it.

The more insane the position the MORE Jack Howell, like his paedophilic leader, scurries like a poop deck rat to crank out reams of meaningless Scriptural gymnastics taken completely out of their original context in an attempt to support their despicable false doctrines and cultic claims. jingle, jingle, jingle goes the vain jangler jack.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Dolly -- tamarisk, 09:53:05 12/31/02 Tue