Dolly -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:37:25 11/21/02 Thu
Author: tamarisk
Subject: Dolly

WRT--"No wonder Tamarisk is messed up doctrinally, theologically, and spiritually. Such people as this cannot be relied upon to preach the Gospel without compromise and hypocrisy, since he has already compromised the facts of history in order to hang on to his man-made traditions which deny the truth that Paul considered Junia, who was female, as an Apostle (Romans 16:17). Perhaps "Tamarisk" should stick to his janitorial duties and leave preaching the Gospel to men and women who have been called, ordained, and anointed of God to preach."

Here is the error of Rt Rev El Pavo, and his wrong thinking. First of all, his scripture reference is a bit off.

Rom 16:7
7 Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
(KJV)

Secondly, Jackals, to professed "profit" of the godz, and knower of the Hebrew and Greek shows his wrong thinking once again.

The name may be masculine, Junias, a contraction of Junianus, or feminine Junia; it is Iounian, the accusative. form, that is given.

In all probability this is the masculine, rather than the feminine, Junias. Paul defines the two as:
(1) "my kinsmen,"
(2) "my fellow-prisoners,"
(3) "who are of note among the apostles," and
(4) "who also have been in Christ before me."

The honorable Rt Rev knows NOT the difference when the Talmidim Sh'aul uses "KINSMEN" instead of "KINSFOLK." Check out the 7 occurances of "kinsmen" and 2 of "kinsfolk" in the KJV Bible.

Neither does Jackals understand who or what is a Jew. Jackals would do well to repent of his Jew hating. Of course, the Rt Rev, to make is false and wrong doctrines hold water(he perverts the water in Acts 2:38), he has to exchange "who are of note AMONG the apostles," to "who are apostles."

Jackals has the same problem as Slick Willie has with the word is.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Tamarisk, ACNR, Bethany & The Saints -- Dolly Llama, 20:42:21 11/22/02 Fri