Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY? -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:05:43 09/25/02 Wed
Author: Sola Scriptura
Subject: Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY?
In reply to: Sola Scriptura 's message, "Re: Is "The" Reverend a PFAKE? Does He INVENT Lies To HARM Others?" on 11:04:48 09/25/02 Wed

~A "DIVENLY CALLED" man would NOT have broached the issue of IP#'s in the first place.

~~ A MATURE man would have ignored it and NEVER MADE IT AN ISSUE or called other's attention to gossip.

~~~An SCRUPULOUS man would have verified his facts BEFORE speaking on the matter in public.

~~~~An ETHICAL man would refrain from jumping to accusing others of something that he has no evidence of.

~~~~~An IMPARTIAL and UPRIGHT man would have cited his evidence BEFORE publicly accusing others on hearsay gossip.

~~~~~~A PRINCIPLED man would check to see if he make a false statement after he was told he had.

~~~~~~~An ETHICAL man would admit his poor judgement and intention to cause harm others.

~~~~~~~~A VIRTUOUS man would seek to correct his actions and apologize to the party he maligned and ask their forgiveness.

PFAKE Bishop Howell is NONE OF THE ABOVE MEN.

>ARE YOU, Jack Howell, MAN ENOUGH TO APOLOGIZE TO SOLA SCRIPTURA
>BECAUSE YOU LIED ABOUT HER AND WERE CARELESS
>AND UN-GODLY BY UNSCRUPULOUSLY BARING FALSE WITNESS?

Rt. Rev Howelloween is a wolf who readily attaches himself to the title of �bishop� like a common leach, yet he declines any of the attending burdens of accountability or responsibility. The Rt Rev has demonstrated an ability to overlook many of scriptural demands placed on the title he covets. He is a virtue-less person who brings disgrace to himself, to Christ, and to the very church he claims to represent.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY? -- demon jack is twice dead, 15:15:04 09/25/02 Wed
- Why Did Rev Jack Become Stricken With PNEUMONIA During His Vacation Time? -- Booda, 23:04:03 09/27/02 Fri
- Re: Do "The" Reverend PFAKE's Actions EDIFY the CHURCH? or do they only satisfy his BELLY? -- Jack Howell was called to his ministry by & for Jack Howell, 22:02:38 09/28/02 Sat