Re: Serpent Egg's Devious Ways (from another forum) -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:53:24 08/25/02 Sun
Author: Sola Scriptura
Subject: Re: Serpent Egg's Devious Ways (from another forum)

Greetings Everyone!

When looking through your archives for the first time the following post jumped out at me and sounded alarm bells. I hope you will indulge my intrusion this once to draw your attention to a wrong done my brother in Christ by the impostor posting something that my brother would loathe to post.

"Date Posted: 11:37:03 08/03/02 Sat
Author: SAK-47
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 200.75.211.35
Subject: Re: Who Was E.W. Kenyon?
In reply to: Evang. Milton Manchester 's message, "Who Was E.W. Kenyon?" on 11:37:03 08/03/02 Sat

My suspicions were further piqued by this post from Mondo:

"Date Posted: 14:59:28 08/03/02 Sat
Author: Mondo
Author Host/IP: px1ar.ed.shawcable.net / 24.70.95.203
Subject: Not sure it is really SAK
In reply to: BJ 's message, "Re: Who Was E.W. Kenyon?" on 14:59:28 08/03/02 Sat

The IP# doesn't look right.

peace"

Mondo was correct. And it was not just the IP# that "didn't look right." Kenyon is the father of some of the most blasphemous heresies confronting Christendom today. Knowing this, it was only necessary to read the first "puff" sentence of the C&P allegedly by "SAK47" to remember where "Kenyon" was last discussed. It was very clear to me that SAK NEVER would endorse Kenyon as this article gushed over Kenyon.

Why do I believe it to be Jack with a proxy? During the same time frame SAK-47 had been countering Kenyon's heresy at another forum. No one even knew who Kenyon was except Jack. Jack was not only the lone objector, but he did so in a most strenuous fashion, if you will pardon the mental picture of mixing jack and the words strenuous and "fashion" together with "Jack" to illustrate a point. LOL!

While it is not my intention to clutter your forum, I would like to correct a fraudulent post by one who may only be: Jack Howell.

An alert was posted at TOT regarding this matter Sunday morning. Jack denied he was the culprit:

"Author:
Rev. Jack Howell
Date Posted: 04:36:25 08/25/02 Sun
In reply to: This Was Posted at Char's By Serpent Egg Using SAK's Name! 04:36:25 08/25/02 Sun

"Wrong. That wasn't me, but oh well. Keep it up as you are building my case for me against you to present further evidence to Southwestern Bell Internet. I will be meeting with their local representative on Monday morning and will present all the archived posts you have posted in which you have libeled and slandered me."

Shortly after the above post: Jack single handedly in what may only be described as MANIC, began trolling and spamming TOT. Of note: a large number of those posts endorsed KENYON! He also posted as Sola Scriptura and SAK-47.

Before I leave here with no further plans to gate crash again, let me just give a short heads up about Kenyon:

~~~~~Essek William Kenyon's life and ministry were enormously impacted by such cults as Science of Mind, the Unity School of Christianity, Christian Science, and New Thought metaphysics. (E. W. Kenyon, The Father and His Family, 17th ed. (Lynnwood, WA: Kenyon's Gospel Publishing Society, 1964), 100; cf. Kenneth E. Hagin, "The Incarnation," The Word of Faith, December 1980, 14)

Many of the phrases popularized by present-day prosperity preachers, such as "What I confess, I possess," were originally coined by Kenyon.

Kenneth Hagin ... plagiarized much of Kenyon's work, including the statement, "Every man who has been 'born again' is an Incarnation, and Christianity is a miracle. The believer is as much an Incarnation as was Jesus of Nazareth." (did that sink in??? think what he said!) (E. W. Kenyon, The Father and His Family, 17th ed. (Lynnwood, WA: Kenyon's Gospel Publishing Society, 1964), 100; cf. Kenneth E. Hagin, "The Incarnation," The Word of Faith, December 1980, 14)

"If Jesus' physical death could pay the penalty for Sin as some contend, then why is it necessary that a Christian die? If a Christian dies physically, does he not pay the penalty of his own sin? If physical death is the penalty for sin, then why do not the whole human race pay their own penalty, and save themselves, for all die? But we hold that the physical death of Jesus did not touch the sin issue at all." (Daniel R. McConnell, A Different Gospel (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1988), 23, 28 note 23)

That only whets one's interest to delve further into this radical blasphemer. Recently, I have come to believe that Jack is a sociopath. I do not say that lightly. In Kenyon, teachings suggesting Jack has power and is an "Incarnation like Christ" must appeal to a man with his proclivities and delusions towards grandeur.

Lastly in really thinking about his "not pressing charges against Char" Could it also be that CANADA is just slightly out of Moore's jurisdiction???? Ya think??? Can anyone say: "SMOKE!"

Thanks for the opportunity to present a correction.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]