Re: Which details do you mean, Rita? -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Fri, February 14 2003, 13:07:40
Author: Margaret
Subject: Re: Which details do you mean, Rita?
In reply to: Todd 's message, "Which details do you mean, Rita?" on Thu, February 13 2003, 5:11:59

Which details? First of all, very strange relation between Regina and Paul Nemenyi. It seems they never lived together. Secondly, the features of Fischer's face are very typical for a half-breed and not for a Jew. Although now there is a theory that a child takes the genes not only from his father but also from his
mother's previous husband. No idea, however, whether the theory is true. Thirdly, it is very strange that Regina hid the truth about Paul Nemenyi even from her children(at least until 1970s). It was not in her character. Forthly, I've never heard that Zurich is located in Poland.

>They did not mention Darrach in the article anywhere.
>Why do you think they used his book?

Because this colorful but fictitious description from there is hard to forget:
In 1960, she moved out, leaving her teenage son alone in a Brooklyn apartment that soon
grew filthy - clogged tubs, roaches, dirty dishes.

As for interpretation Regina's departure as 'a relief', I heard another side of the story: 'a blow', 'an
orphan with still alive parents'.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

True for dogs! -- Todd, Sun, February 16 2003, 4:34:03
- Re: True for dogs! -- Margaret, Sun, February 16 2003, 13:57:30
Re: Which details do you mean, Rita? -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, February 16 2003, 8:28:27
- Re: Which details do you mean, Rita? -- Margaret, Sun, February 16 2003, 13:52:49
- Read this one, the previous message wasn't posted completely -- Margaret, Sun, February 16 2003, 14:08:37
  - Mixing up a goat with a sheep. -- Peter van der Hoog, Sun, February 16 2003, 17:50:43
    - Family reunion, you know! -- Todd, Mon, February 17 2003, 4:14:57
      - Crooked nail -- Peter van der Hoog, Mon, February 17 2003, 7:27:29
        Re: Crooked nail -- Todd, Mon, February 17 2003, 10:20:17
        Some more crooked nails -- Todd, Tue, February 18 2003, 9:41:28
        Inaccuracy, but.... -- Margaret, Tue, February 18 2003, 15:25:14
        Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 3:39:04
        Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 8:15:56
        It were the same journalists of the same newspaper! -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:09:30
        OK, they are -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 17:57:21
        Believe or not believe, that is the question -- Katerina, Thu, February 20 2003, 3:23:06
        Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Todd, Thu, February 20 2003, 6:31:40
        Re: Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, February 20 2003, 16:45:13
        You taught me to be a bore, Peter! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 4:25:44
        Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:02:14
        Re: Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:57:22
        No special questions -- Margaret, Fri, February 21 2003, 14:41:19
        Three versions -- Todd, Sat, February 22 2003, 7:32:21
        The first or the second ones -- Margaret, Sun, February 23 2003, 13:39:14
        A dictionary for reading between the lines -- Margaret, Thu, February 20 2003, 21:41:48
        Did not you read the original of the first article? -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:50:08
        Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Margaret, Wed, February 19 2003, 14:30:05
    - Re: Mixing up a goat with a sheep. -- Margaret, Mon, February 17 2003, 14:04:14
      - Do you like to eat in a mash? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, February 18 2003, 19:11:34
        Re: Do you like to eat in a mash? -- Margaret, Wed, February 19 2003, 13:35:53
- Peter, is that yer room? -- Todd, Thu, January 29 2004, 6:05:02