define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- robdogdotcom

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party

Author:
Melvin Q. Clumpadump and I may be old, but . . .
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05:30:53 06/06/04 Sun

. . . we do read EVERY word on this MB and the main page.

Second issue: speaking of jobs, there is a psychological profile test floating around out there used by consultants trying to help GOVERNMENTS hire law enforcement personnal that asks: "True or False, Lincoln was a better president than Washington?" How would you answer the question? Why?

Would your answer be any diffierent if the question were: "True or False, Washingon was a better president than Lincoln?" Why?

Keep in mind that on the actual test you must only answer "T" or "F" -- you may NOT explain your answer and you may not skip the question.

Amazing that two people who profess to not relish the candidacy of either front runner can find so much to quibble about. Kind of keeps our minds off other stuff, doesn't it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party Jeff 05:02:43 06/07/04 Mon

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- schilda, 05:20:30 06/07/04 Mon

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party Rob Dog Bastard 20:31:35 06/07/04 Mon

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- schilda, 21:58:29 06/07/04 Mon

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- Rob Dog Bastard, 06:57:48 06/08/04 Tue

Re: define, please, "liberal" & "conservative" W/O reference to BUSH or KERRY or political party -- Jeff, 14:06:43 06/08/04 Tue

The problem I have with liberals in general . . . -- Rob Dog Bastard, 17:11:27 06/08/04 Tue

Re: The problem I have with labels and groupings . . . -- schilda, 04:50:31 06/09/04 Wed

Re: The problem I have with labels and groupings . . . -- Jeff, 05:34:38 06/09/04 Wed
How to dissolve the two-party system -- Rob Dog Bastard, 06:48:11 06/09/04 Wed

Re: How to dissolve the two-party system -- schilda, 18:04:09 06/09/04 Wed

Step by step. -- Rob Dog Bastard, 20:29:53 06/09/04 Wed

Re: Step by step. -- schilda, 04:59:58 06/10/04 Thu

Re: Step by step. -- Jeff, 05:37:05 06/10/04 Thu

Re: The problem I have with liberals in general . . . -- Ray, 03:15:20 06/13/04 Sun

Give me a big kiss, Ray. -- Rob Dog Bastard, 07:37:06 06/13/04 Sun

"The MOST I can get out of these people" - looks like you are the one with the problem -- Ray, 23:59:24 06/16/04 Wed