Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, June 08, 02:06:16pm

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

• Staggering some people still defend him - he stuck a video of him chatting wrestling yesterday; the ffc reaction was pretty unanimous - get him out. (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:00:48pm (haye-26-b2-v4wan-176856-cust60.vm28.cable.virginm.net/62.252.163.61)
  • Would you sack your son? (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:19:48pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
    • Would I appoint him in a totally unsuitable roll and allow him to have zero focus on it? No. I’m anti nepotism in business anyway. (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:24:31pm (NoHost/46.31.84.144)
      • *role (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:25:32pm (NoHost/46.31.84.144)
      • Would you sack your son? (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:28:14pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
        • Yes (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:31:08pm (NoHost/46.31.84.144)
          • You took a while to answer this so I guess it wouldn't be something you wouldn't find easy or in reality be able to do. I wouldn't do it if I thought it would seriously damage my relationship with my son, especially if they would stand to inherit said business in my will. Messy old business families. (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:39:12pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
            • 3 mins! Down to captcha. Poor effort. (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:44:36pm (NoHost/46.31.84.144)
              • Words come easy, actions can be a lot harder in family affairs, as you know deep down. (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:49:29pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
    • I would expect any Son to realise that in this case , the position is too much for him esp as his main focus is elsewhere . If he didn’t do the manly thing and step-down then absolutely I would do it for him . I’m disappointed Shad hasn’t intervened , and were he ( TK) too cowardly he even has his other Ventures to use as a reason so as to ‘save face’ . However you look at it , he wants the glory but for me there is nothing more despicable than boasting about ‘inherited’ wealth (NT) -- Mickey, Sunday, June 07, 02:31:38pm (82-132-228-77.dab.02.net/82.132.228.77)
      • To be honest, I think compromise is the oil that allows the wheels of business to turn, so I don't get hung on these issues like you. I think that maybe you are a bit too polarised in your thinking. You continually long for change where you have no power to influence change. It's like you keep on trying to hammer a bent nail into wood. What a waste of your energy. (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:47:11pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
        • I see this from a different viewpoint. If I had a child whom I felt was not best equipped to strive out on their own, I would regard it as a worthy use for parental resources to ease him or her on their way through life. (NT) -- Barry@ENF, Sunday, June 07, 06:26:22pm (NoHost/90.243.152.38)
          • Yes 'tough love' as some call it. The thing is though, that Shahid Khan might have a totally different opinion of his son's worth, in his role at FFC, to what is expressed by some on here and on speculative podcasts. As CJ might have said...I didn't get where I am today by employing incompetent offspring. (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 07:09:32pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)

  ---

• Your obsession is bordering on stalking. (NT) -- Barry@ENF, Sunday, June 07, 02:01:04pm (NoHost/90.243.152.38)

  ---

• So on other sites people are speculating about the next possible incoming Head Coach and considering their tactics , but you are still banging about the same thing you were banging on about 10 years ago. What bit don't you understand about - Tony Khan is not leaving? (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 02:26:28pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)
  • We’d be Fulham Park Rangers if fans didn’t protest. Our current fanbase are the softest in the league. Thankfully they weren’t about then. (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 02:33:31pm (NoHost/46.31.84.144)
    • Why should TK say anything? Silva is contracted to 30 June. (NT) -- Birdman, Sunday, June 07, 02:40:27pm (NoHost/78.111.194.83)
    • Hardness you say. I think that of a boiled egg or metallurgy perhaps. So to reach that hallowed level, do I need to be Combat 18 & Shed-qualified? Or fit in at the old Den? Must be my softness that lets a little gloom on a day following a loss, though thankfully not disturbing that night’s sleep; but clearly not so soft as to have stopped me following the club since the 50's through thick and thin, or for that matter playing my part in raising this family’s 4th generation of FFC supporters. (NT) -- Barry@ENF, Sunday, June 07, 07:14:47pm (NoHost/90.243.152.38)
  • They’re also talking about the hierarchy and how it is preventing the Club from taking the forward steps it should . Oh and they’re also talking about how unprepared the Club seem to have been -despite them suggesting otherwise - in sourcing a managerial replacement 🤡 (NT) -- Mickey, Sunday, June 07, 02:37:45pm (82-132-228-77.dab.02.net/82.132.228.77)
    • Not the one I favour these days. (NT) -- Mr Kurkuruza, Sunday, June 07, 03:19:25pm (217-155-46-35.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk/217.155.46.35)

  ---

• I'll be pleased if it does turn out that TK's role has, in practice shrunk (even if retaining a title as fig leaf). However, it's skirting extremely close to bad taste to cite the *1987 struggle to keep us alive as a club* with the voicing of complaint about the occupation of an executive position. Agreed not a minor executive position, but still.... (NT) -- b+w g., Sunday, June 07, 08:11:23pm (host86-176-251-213.range86-176.btcentralplus.com/86.176.251.213)
  • Well when I was one of a few protesting outside Loftus Road to keep us at the cottage, we got abused by many. Modern fans don’t care I’m afraid. (NT) -- woodman, Sunday, June 07, 09:23:08pm (haye-26-b2-v4wan-176856-cust60.vm28.cable.virginm.net/62.252.163.61)

  ---

• Not allowed while dad's driving - quite right, too.. We know nothing! (NT) -- Old Dave., Sunday, June 07, 10:05:43pm (54.249.125.91.dyn.plus.net/91.125.249.54)

  ---

• It's amazing that Mickey, Balsaman, et al actually seem to WANT theKhans to fail! (NT) -- Supposed to be fans?, Sunday, June 07, 11:27:26pm (unn-109-61-85-45.datapacket.com/109.61.85.45)