Thanks. The numbers you are looking at do not seem to have been adjusted. Please take a look at an article that I will link at the end of this message that better explains what I am talking about. Also when replying to a message click on the message you are replying to, not the "[ Post a Reply to this Message ]" link that replies to the main message. Note: when reading the article do not worry so much about the RPI numbers they reference b/c they are most likely from March 11th where the numbers you currently see on most sites are as of March 13th.</a> <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/luke_winn/03/12/rpi.blunder/index.html" target="_blank"><b>link to article</b></a> -- Fordham Rams Basketball Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed March 16, 2005 10:33:23
Author: J�Dete93
Subject: Thanks. The numbers you are looking at do not seem to have been adjusted. Please take a look at an article that I will link at the end of this message that better explains what I am talking about. Also when replying to a message click on the message you are replying to, not the "[ Post a Reply to this Message ]" link that replies to the main message. Note: when reading the article do not worry so much about the RPI numbers they reference b/c they are most likely from March 11th where the numbers you currently see on most sites are as of March 13th. link to article
In reply to: John's 307 's message, "RPIRATINGS.com and TeamRankings.com have HC at 53. Though I'm not arguing these are more correct than other RPI sources last night's announcers on ESPN qouted a 53 RPI and made the point that HC was higher than Iowa and UAB. I do agree though that they didn't have any marquee victories." on Wed March 16, 2005 10:10:50

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Interesting, it seems the announcers on last night's telecast continue to use incorrect data. (NT) -- John's 307, Wed March 16, 2005 10:53:55

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.