Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]

• The basketball team faces criticism on their play and the decisions they make on the court and at the same time praised for their great play. I know there is very little criticism in regard to the basketball team's looks like the criticism Tom has faced. In fact i don't remember any criticism in that regard to a present player and if it gets posted Jodete takes it down. Tom has been wrongfully criticized about things that have nothing to do with his writing. If you say "I didnt not like the article. I was offended" then fine, that is your right, but to personally bash him is wrong and I will not alllow those attacks to be posted without a proper rebuttal. And if you think his writing was not intelligent and witty than I am sorry you do not agree with the sense of humor of many of the student body. I definitly won't be sharing mozzarella sticks with you! (NT) -- Worried RAM, Mon March 14, 2005 21:17:34
  • I agree that Tom should not be criticized for his looks, but you appear to be responding to me. (CF., your first sentence, the positioning of your response with reference to mine, and your threat about mozzarella sticks.) Where did I attack his looks? In fact, I offered several substantive criticisms of his writing. Others criticized the writing as in bad taste. It's also biased against gay people, in case you hadn't noticed the remark against Melissa Etheridge. Just where do you disagree with my criticisms? You're arguing with the wrong person. In fact, your response is obtuse because it seeks to categorize all of the criticisms as ad hominem criticism of Tom. That's not true. In fact, his whole article is ad hominem criticism of people in rural NY and PA. (NT) -- Drag-less, Mon March 14, 2005 21:33:20
    • I was responding to your post b/c you mentioned something about "the garbage about not criticizing a fordham student." I figured that was in response to one of my posts(was I right?). The Mozz stick joke was in light of Tom's not sharing one with the guy who didn't wash his hands and it was said to you b/c i guess we differ in a sense of humor, so we wouldn't be sharing any in a social setting either( not meant as a threat). I didnt say you criticized Tom's looks and I appreciate you saying its wrong. So I guess that part of my post is not really to you but thats what I meant when I said not to criticize FU students(no remarks on one's looks). I disagree with your criticism that it was boring and not funny. And regard to spelling errors you talked about I guess the buck does stop with him, but those errors can be made by many sources such as the copy team,the exec board, or even the other sports editor. click 4 more -- Worried RAM, Mon March 14, 2005 23:50:45
  • Marcus Stout is ugly, as is most of the team. (NT) -- buster, Tue March 15, 2005 02:48:13