VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon March 14, 2005 23:12:19
Author: Mojofunk'75
Subject: the paper put The Ram to shame. Hope it's still alive and kicking. As for The Ram article in question, "sophomoric" comes to mind.
In reply to: JoltinJoe 's message, "Yikes! That article would never have run in either The Ram or the paper in my days at Fordham. Sorry to hear comments from '02 grads that this article belongs in the paper. the paper was once an interesting, thought-provoking alternative to The Ram that students actually couldn't wait to get their hands on. From this comment, it sounds like it has hit on some lean times." on Mon March 14, 2005 15:11:22


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.