Joe, the whole point of learning journalism is learning to think and write coherently under time constraints. That IS the job! Technology doesn't solve those time constraints; in fact, in some ways, it has made them worse. The kid wrote a poorly thought out, un sophisticated, unfair piece. Like others above, I don't want him fired. Indeed, whoever was supposed to edit him is who should be on the hot seat. But please don't make excuses about time or technology. -- Fordham Rams Basketball Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue March 15, 2005 22:51:55
Author: rc74
Subject: Joe, the whole point of learning journalism is learning to think and write coherently under time constraints. That IS the job! Technology doesn't solve those time constraints; in fact, in some ways, it has made them worse. The kid wrote a poorly thought out, un sophisticated, unfair piece. Like others above, I don't want him fired. Indeed, whoever was supposed to edit him is who should be on the hot seat. But please don't make excuses about time or technology.
In reply to: JoltinJoe 's message, "I know how good The Ram was in your era. We frequently used The Ram for research when preparing stories and features for the paper, and the 1970s Rams were a pleasure to read. But I also know what enormous time commitments were necessary to put out a first-rate paper at Fordham, given the substandard technology we (and you) faced. We lost time from class and from study. I only brought this up because I suspect that Mr. Cataldo was faced with severe time constraints when he wrote his article. Given time to reflect, he might have written something better. His article was poor, true, but I thought it was important for those of you who are so critical of this young man to understand how the severe time constraints imposed on our student editors can affect their judgment." on Tue March 15, 2005 14:35:04

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I'm not making excuses. I'm just offering an explanation for the benefit of those who never worked on a Fordham publication. Sure, a professional journalist or editor works under time constraints. But the time constraints faced by a student can be worse, resulting from limited technology which forces the students to spend more time on a task than a professional might. I disagree about technology. Used properly, it is always a great asset. In this regard, I'm not just talking about copy features, like spell check. I'm talking about technological featues that assist in layout. I offer no excuse. The article should not have run. On the other hand, the criticism of this student has been way too extreme, so I tendered an explanation based on my experience at Fordham. (NT) -- JoltinJoe, Wed March 16, 2005 06:22:16

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.