VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

07/15/25 10:48:18pmLogin ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10/18/07 5:06:58am
Author: Casey
Subject: Re: Quota Hunt Workshop
In reply to: markm 's message, "Re: Quota Hunt Workshop" on 10/17/07 10:19:46pm

Mark,

The attending FWC Staff and the one FWC vote on this board told the stakeholders, that this was going to possible kill the hold deal with the Commission. They will never go for taxing the hunters in the State. And that it would also hurt the out of State hunter because he would have to buy an annual license instead of a 10 day for Turkey. So right off the bat an out of state turkey hunters would have to spend $181.00 and if not draw he would lose that money. The stakeholders didn't want to cut this requirement at first, they tried a taking out the requirement for just the out of state hunter and then the FWC said the Commission would still reject the whole plan because it wouldn't be fair to the in state hunter. So finally they gave it a toss. They came very close to getting the stakeholders to agree to making all permits non-transferable because the stakeholders were hoping by adding the two requirements would stop the "GAMING" in the second and third phases that are proposed to stay transferable. I can tell you that every since the second meeting there has never been any vote or talk about keeping them non-transferable.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.