VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]910 ]
Subject: Re: Does anyone understand how the finals show will start off Thursday night ? After the top 15 are announced, what do they go through before it is narrowed to 7 ???


Author:
Please tell they get to answer at least one question before being cut to 7
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 15:30:01 12/18/19 Wed
In reply to: 's message, "Re: Does anyone understand how the finals show will start off Thursday night ? After the top 15 are announced, what do they go through before it is narrowed to 7 ???" on 15:03:32 12/18/19 Wed

>>>Top of the evening everyone!
>>>
>>>I think that Mu talent was a big drop-off from the
>>>first night. It's not that there weren't average or
>>>subpar talents on night 1, but it kind of seemed like
>>>in Mu, nobody really had any standout performances.
>>>Alpha had some really enjoyable performances. There
>>>was a lot of debate in the threads beneath about what
>>>constitutes talent and entertainment. I think a lot
>>>of the talents did not engage the audience as did in
>>>Alpha. I do think based on some of the people in the
>>>audience that Indiana resonated as she did with me.
>>>And apparently did Virginia. But there were not any
>>>real "wow" moments. Just a lot more average
>>>performances. Here is my rundown of talent:
>>>
>>>AK-danced to It’s All Coming Back to Me Now by
>>>Celine Dion. (I wanted to dance to this song,
>>>actually.) Unfortunately, I think Maile had some
>>>trouble with it. I don’t know if it was slippery
>>>for her, it kind of looked like she might have
>>>slipped. 4-5
>>>RI-did an Irish Step Dance. Bridget set the bar SO
>>>HIGH last year it’s hard to ever look at Irish Step
>>>Dance again without thinking of that standard. Molly
>>>didn’t do bad with it at all, however. I would
>call
>>>it average good, maybe 6.5
>>>MS-I think it was the Midnight Aria. I recognized
>it,
>>>I’ve heard it many times before. She did well with
>>>it, one of the better in this group. I would give it
>>>a solid 7.
>>>MT-Sang the Smash song. It was a big song, I don’t
>>>think she hit some of the notes she needed too well,
>>>but it was a nice attempt. 5.5
>>>DE-She sang the Amy Winehouse song Valerie. It was
>>>kind of interesting-unique, something you don’t
>hear
>>>a lot. It sounded more modern, I give her props for
>>>taking on something original. I would say it was
>>>energetic, her voice kind of had a modern edge to
>it.
>>>6
>>>TX-She played “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough”
>on
>>>the flute. It was more entertaining, but straight
>out
>>>of the 70s. The accompany music was very 70s, it
>>>almost reminded me of what you would see in a pageant
>>>circa 1971. It was definitely more entertaining than
>>>technical. I would give it a 5 as far as
>performance,
>>>6 on the cheese factor.
>>>IL-Sang Son of a Preacher Man. I don’t know, I am
>>>not a big fan of this song in competition. It just
>>>never goes well. It’s like Proud Mary-you don’t
>>>want to try and imitate the original. Ariel has a
>>>nice voice, I just don’t think she got a chance to
>>>showcase it very well. 5.5
>>>FL-Didn’t recognize the music, but she did a
>lyrical
>>>dance. I thought it was pretty, actually, and she
>had
>>>a nice costume. One of the better talents of last
>>>night. 6.5 to 7
>>>VA-Of course, the science demonstration/experiment.
>I
>>>am looking at how she presented herself-she was
>>>energetic and engaged the crowd. I would say that
>her
>>>presentation probably won her the win. She had
>>>enthusiasm, and there wasn’t a lot of other
>>>enthusiasm last night. I think just the energy of it
>>>was what drew the judges in. 8
>>>KY-Sang Maybe This Time. Also a song we’ve seen
>>>many times over, but a decent performance. I would
>>>put it in the average category.6
>>>IN-Sang You Will Be Found. It was a lovely, lovely
>>>performance. Tiara has a huge voice and she really
>>>connected with the emotions of the song. I *hope* we
>>>get to see it.
>>>WV-did a baton twirling routine. Unfortunately, she
>>>did drop her baton once. It wasn’t too bad, but it
>>>was noticeable. It was probably hard because MO had
>>>such a good presentation the night before. It did
>>>have some good energy though. 6
>>>WY-Tap dance to 9 to 5. Again like with TX, a little
>>>old fashioned, but it was cute nonetheless.
>>>NV-Did a comedic monologue. She did impressions of
>>>other people and had some funny moments. It wasn’t
>>>outstanding, but it was a nice change of pace. 6.5
>>>NE-Sang Vanessa Williams 😊 It was a good choice
>>>for her. I think this is actually a good song for
>>>someone who isn’t a soprano. It has a nice
>melody.
>>>I have a good memory-Shawntel Smith sang this in the
>>>Macy’s Parade in 1995. I would say Allie’s
>>>performance was maybe a 5.5 to 6. It wasn’t bad in
>>>any way, just a little laid back.
>>>MD-Played The Swan on the cello. She had a nice
>>>performance, wasn’t anything outstanding, but
>>>pleasant to hear. 6
>>>ME-I want to say this was a Lindsay Sterling song,
>she
>>>played violin. It had some energy, I put it in the
>>>good average range. 6 to 6.5
>>>MI-Sang Feeling Good. If I never, ever, ever, never,
>>>ever never ever ever hear this song again at a
>pageant
>>>I will be none the happier. But I doubt I will get
>my
>>>wish. That being said, it’s usually a song for
>>>someone with a limited vocal ability. When Mallory
>>>started to get into some of the higher notes and more
>>>dynamics of the performance, she went off key. I
>>>really think it was only a 4.
>>>WA-did a tap dance. It was an energetic dance, I
>>>enjoyed the energy of it. I would say that it was
>>>probably the best dancer of the evening. 7
>>>LA-sang I Will Always Love You. Again like some of
>>>the talents, it’s a huge song to take on. She has
>a
>>>decent voice, but it was just too big to take on for
>>>the high notes, I thought. I would give it a 6.
>>>WI-Did a tap dance. It was a little less energetic
>>>than WA, it was an average performance. 5.5
>>>NM-Did a hip hop dance. I thought it was good to try
>>>something different, and I give her props for it.
>The
>>>only thing is, I am far from an expert on all things
>>>hip hop, but it didn’t seem that remarkable. I
>>>would say 6 for the overall attempt, but a 5 for the
>>>dancing.
>>>MN-Sang Nature Boy. It was kind of a musical theater
>>>presentation. I thought she did well with it. She
>>>kind of looked like Mrs. Maisel. 6.5 to 7
>>>AZ-played the pageant standard Habanera. It was an
>>>average kind of good performance 6.
>>>ID-I am someone who really wish that we would see
>>>actual talents instead of contestants just taking on
>>>something pageant acceptable. Grace chose to
>>>demonstrate her ceramics talent, but the problem was
>>>is that you had a short time to get in what you
>needed
>>>to do. Years ago, we saw sewing demonstrations, some
>>>contestants would come out with something they had
>>>already drawn, etc. I am not sure how you would have
>>>scored this, but I do give her a lot of credit for
>>>actually demonstrating something she was good and
>>>talented at. I am not talented in any way with
>>>ceramics, and I enjoyed it. I couldn’t have given
>>>it anything more than an average score, but I thought
>>>with maybe some more time it would have been more
>>>effective. It was in no way weak, just different.
>>>NJ-operatic vocal. She had a solid performance,
>maybe
>>>not as strong as some of the Alpha group, but she was
>>>good. I would say 7 to 7.5.
>>>
>>>My next post will be the big post about each
>>>contestant. Just because the weather sucks pretty
>>>badly, we may wait until later to travel or change
>>>plans. Everyone's concerns about the weather in New
>>>England in December were quite valid. The only good
>>>thing is that they are used to this and much more
>>>prepared. Today SUCKED.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: I heard from my State Board Chair that after the 15 are announced, they all go backstage. The 7 are called from backstage one by one to answer their question(s) and interact with judges.


Author:
No name
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:52:02 12/18/19 Wed

>>>Top of the evening everyone!
>>>
>>>I think that Mu talent was a big drop-off from the
>>>first night. It's not that there weren't average or
>>>subpar talents on night 1, but it kind of seemed like
>>>in Mu, nobody really had any standout performances.
>>>Alpha had some really enjoyable performances. There
>>>was a lot of debate in the threads beneath about what
>>>constitutes talent and entertainment. I think a lot
>>>of the talents did not engage the audience as did in
>>>Alpha. I do think based on some of the people in the
>>>audience that Indiana resonated as she did with me.
>>>And apparently did Virginia. But there were not any
>>>real "wow" moments. Just a lot more average
>>>performances. Here is my rundown of talent:
>>>
>>>AK-danced to It’s All Coming Back to Me Now by
>>>Celine Dion. (I wanted to dance to this song,
>>>actually.) Unfortunately, I think Maile had some
>>>trouble with it. I don’t know if it was slippery
>>>for her, it kind of looked like she might have
>>>slipped. 4-5
>>>RI-did an Irish Step Dance. Bridget set the bar SO
>>>HIGH last year it’s hard to ever look at Irish Step
>>>Dance again without thinking of that standard. Molly
>>>didn’t do bad with it at all, however. I would
>call
>>>it average good, maybe 6.5
>>>MS-I think it was the Midnight Aria. I recognized
>it,
>>>I’ve heard it many times before. She did well with
>>>it, one of the better in this group. I would give it
>>>a solid 7.
>>>MT-Sang the Smash song. It was a big song, I don’t
>>>think she hit some of the notes she needed too well,
>>>but it was a nice attempt. 5.5
>>>DE-She sang the Amy Winehouse song Valerie. It was
>>>kind of interesting-unique, something you don’t
>hear
>>>a lot. It sounded more modern, I give her props for
>>>taking on something original. I would say it was
>>>energetic, her voice kind of had a modern edge to
>it.
>>>6
>>>TX-She played “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough”
>on
>>>the flute. It was more entertaining, but straight
>out
>>>of the 70s. The accompany music was very 70s, it
>>>almost reminded me of what you would see in a pageant
>>>circa 1971. It was definitely more entertaining than
>>>technical. I would give it a 5 as far as
>performance,
>>>6 on the cheese factor.
>>>IL-Sang Son of a Preacher Man. I don’t know, I am
>>>not a big fan of this song in competition. It just
>>>never goes well. It’s like Proud Mary-you don’t
>>>want to try and imitate the original. Ariel has a
>>>nice voice, I just don’t think she got a chance to
>>>showcase it very well. 5.5
>>>FL-Didn’t recognize the music, but she did a
>lyrical
>>>dance. I thought it was pretty, actually, and she
>had
>>>a nice costume. One of the better talents of last
>>>night. 6.5 to 7
>>>VA-Of course, the science demonstration/experiment.
>I
>>>am looking at how she presented herself-she was
>>>energetic and engaged the crowd. I would say that
>her
>>>presentation probably won her the win. She had
>>>enthusiasm, and there wasn’t a lot of other
>>>enthusiasm last night. I think just the energy of it
>>>was what drew the judges in. 8
>>>KY-Sang Maybe This Time. Also a song we’ve seen
>>>many times over, but a decent performance. I would
>>>put it in the average category.6
>>>IN-Sang You Will Be Found. It was a lovely, lovely
>>>performance. Tiara has a huge voice and she really
>>>connected with the emotions of the song. I *hope* we
>>>get to see it.
>>>WV-did a baton twirling routine. Unfortunately, she
>>>did drop her baton once. It wasn’t too bad, but it
>>>was noticeable. It was probably hard because MO had
>>>such a good presentation the night before. It did
>>>have some good energy though. 6
>>>WY-Tap dance to 9 to 5. Again like with TX, a little
>>>old fashioned, but it was cute nonetheless.
>>>NV-Did a comedic monologue. She did impressions of
>>>other people and had some funny moments. It wasn’t
>>>outstanding, but it was a nice change of pace. 6.5
>>>NE-Sang Vanessa Williams 😊 It was a good choice
>>>for her. I think this is actually a good song for
>>>someone who isn’t a soprano. It has a nice
>melody.
>>>I have a good memory-Shawntel Smith sang this in the
>>>Macy’s Parade in 1995. I would say Allie’s
>>>performance was maybe a 5.5 to 6. It wasn’t bad in
>>>any way, just a little laid back.
>>>MD-Played The Swan on the cello. She had a nice
>>>performance, wasn’t anything outstanding, but
>>>pleasant to hear. 6
>>>ME-I want to say this was a Lindsay Sterling song,
>she
>>>played violin. It had some energy, I put it in the
>>>good average range. 6 to 6.5
>>>MI-Sang Feeling Good. If I never, ever, ever, never,
>>>ever never ever ever hear this song again at a
>pageant
>>>I will be none the happier. But I doubt I will get
>my
>>>wish. That being said, it’s usually a song for
>>>someone with a limited vocal ability. When Mallory
>>>started to get into some of the higher notes and more
>>>dynamics of the performance, she went off key. I
>>>really think it was only a 4.
>>>WA-did a tap dance. It was an energetic dance, I
>>>enjoyed the energy of it. I would say that it was
>>>probably the best dancer of the evening. 7
>>>LA-sang I Will Always Love You. Again like some of
>>>the talents, it’s a huge song to take on. She has
>a
>>>decent voice, but it was just too big to take on for
>>>the high notes, I thought. I would give it a 6.
>>>WI-Did a tap dance. It was a little less energetic
>>>than WA, it was an average performance. 5.5
>>>NM-Did a hip hop dance. I thought it was good to try
>>>something different, and I give her props for it.
>The
>>>only thing is, I am far from an expert on all things
>>>hip hop, but it didn’t seem that remarkable. I
>>>would say 6 for the overall attempt, but a 5 for the
>>>dancing.
>>>MN-Sang Nature Boy. It was kind of a musical theater
>>>presentation. I thought she did well with it. She
>>>kind of looked like Mrs. Maisel. 6.5 to 7
>>>AZ-played the pageant standard Habanera. It was an
>>>average kind of good performance 6.
>>>ID-I am someone who really wish that we would see
>>>actual talents instead of contestants just taking on
>>>something pageant acceptable. Grace chose to
>>>demonstrate her ceramics talent, but the problem was
>>>is that you had a short time to get in what you
>needed
>>>to do. Years ago, we saw sewing demonstrations, some
>>>contestants would come out with something they had
>>>already drawn, etc. I am not sure how you would have
>>>scored this, but I do give her a lot of credit for
>>>actually demonstrating something she was good and
>>>talented at. I am not talented in any way with
>>>ceramics, and I enjoyed it. I couldn’t have given
>>>it anything more than an average score, but I thought
>>>with maybe some more time it would have been more
>>>effective. It was in no way weak, just different.
>>>NJ-operatic vocal. She had a solid performance,
>maybe
>>>not as strong as some of the Alpha group, but she was
>>>good. I would say 7 to 7.5.
>>>
>>>My next post will be the big post about each
>>>contestant. Just because the weather sucks pretty
>>>badly, we may wait until later to travel or change
>>>plans. Everyone's concerns about the weather in New
>>>England in December were quite valid. The only good
>>>thing is that they are used to this and much more
>>>prepared. Today SUCKED.


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.