VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

7/10/25 10:50pmLogin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23/05/21 2:09pm
Author: John
Subject: I feel you mate and agree something needs to be done
In reply to: D9 's message, "Ruck Balance" on 22/05/21 8:36pm

Biggest issues with this league (and any keeper league with squads higher than 40). Is that coaches will and have used the depth to be able to stock up on those hard to fill to either charge a premium or be make it harder for others.

Sides with most ruck eligible
Magpies (8) 3 playing
Kings (6)
Warriors (6) 4 best 22 but I argue Aliir and Blicavs are not rucks.
Spurs (6) 1 is currently playing
Stags (6) 4 best 22
Dogs (6) 2.. could argue Naughton should be r eligible.. but tough.
Giants (5)
Rams (5) 2 currently in best 22
Spurs (5) 2 currently play
Cats (5) 3 currently playing
Burras (4)
Bombers (4) 1 best 22
Whippets (3) 2 in best 22
Roos (3)

Do we put a cap on how many clubs hold onto or ban clubs with enough rucks to take them? Doubt that will go down well with some.

Considering afl clubs have 3.. maybe 4 at absolute max in a squad of 40..

I was in favour of reducing SL list sizes as afl did. But that was shot down.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.