Ruck Balance -- SuperLeague

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

7/10/25 11:12am [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22/05/21 8:36pm
Author: D9
Subject: Ruck Balance

I have two - three very capable ruckman in my side if my first two ruckman do not play. Witts has done an ACL and stupid AFL coach Chris Scott has decided to have it in for Rhys Stanley.

If my side was an actual AFL side, I would simply put Balta, Weideman or Roughead in the Ruck to cover the shortage. But because these players never need to do this in their current sides, they are not listed as Ruckman in my balance despite all three being able and willing if needed.

This is not realistic, if my side was an AFL side. Ruckman and capable replacements need to be look into, as we want this comp to be realistic.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Mid season trade/draft coming up -- Robert, 23/05/21 4:27am
- So more and more unrealistic -- D9, 23/05/21 1:01pm
I feel you mate and agree something needs to be done -- John, 23/05/21 2:09pm
- It all is simple if we keep it realistic. -- D9, 23/05/21 11:22pm
  - Balta is listed as Ruck in SL - problem already solved (NT) -- Brendan, 24/05/21 11:43am
    - He wasn't, someone changed that -- D9, 26/05/21 10:53pm
  - 11 coaches voted yes for balance -- GTD, 24/05/21 12:33pm
    - Voted for balance rules to come in, but the changes over time not voted on -- D9, 26/05/21 10:46pm
      - Don’t let facts get in the way of your argument... -- GTD, 27/05/21 12:02am
        I read the posts you refer to and -- D9, 27/05/21 3:37pm
        LOL - did you forget that COVID happened last year?? -- GTD, 27/05/21 5:18pm
        Facts -- D9, 28/05/21 2:46pm
        Oh, and why do sensible calls need to wait until end year? -- D9, 28/05/21 3:54pm
        So the rule is this apparently..... -- D9, 28/05/21 4:16pm
        emails were sent the proposal was posted -- GTD, 28/05/21 11:06pm
        Post some proof to that. -- D9, 29/05/21 1:52pm
        The post i reference literally asks coaches to comment on the proposal.. -- GTD, 29/05/21 8:11pm
        YOU proposed -- D9, 31/05/21 2:21pm
        Mods discussed this via email - i posted it -- GTD, 31/05/21 4:55pm
        It appears that way to a couple of coach -- D9, 31/05/21 6:01pm
        Lol -- GTD, 28/05/21 11:17pm
        I have left my personal email with Mods -- D9, 29/05/21 1:57pm
        I have decided to just play him there if I need to and refuse to cop a penalty (NT) -- John, 28/05/21 4:17pm
        Dixon -- Brendan, 29/05/21 9:50am
        Here: -- D9, 29/05/21 2:06pm
        Yeh, the 3HO rule... Not Dixon. If he meets that now, he gets eligibility at MS (NT) -- Brendan, 29/05/21 4:36pm
        Once again you try and twist the truth to suit your argument -- GTD, 29/05/21 8:13pm
        WTF are you talking about -- D9, 31/05/21 2:26pm
        happy do changes whenever -- GTD, 28/05/21 11:10pm
My two cents -- Slade, 25/05/21 5:48pm
- Well said Slade. Valid points (NT) -- John, 26/05/21 1:10am
  - Yep all valid... And we're currently going with #1 - you are filling the ruck role -- Brendan, 26/05/21 9:57pm
    - Did Grundy? -- D9, 26/05/21 10:59pm
- Rule change suggestion -- Slade, 28/05/21 2:43pm
  - My view -- Brendan, 29/05/21 9:41am
    - Case by Case -- Slade, 29/05/21 2:34pm
      - There are more coaches wanting this in discussions I have had -- D9, 29/05/21 3:27pm
        I agree with case by case. But.. -- John, 29/05/21 3:47pm
        Agreed -- Slade, 29/05/21 4:27pm
Have and Have nots....................why has this occurred? -- Maxwell, 27/05/21 10:58am
- If you want to go back to 2015, check archives -- Maxwell, 27/05/21 11:07am
- You missed the point completely -- D9, 27/05/21 2:50pm
- Ok, just................... -- Maxwell, 27/05/21 5:45pm
  - Probably fair calls Max, but a couple of things -- D9, 28/05/21 1:55pm
    - I 'resolved' your question -- Brendan, 29/05/21 10:07am
      - Realistic -- D9, 29/05/21 2:20pm
- My 2 Cents on Have's and Have Not's and all in between. -- John, 28/05/21 4:14pm
  - At the end of the day -- D9, 28/05/21 4:50pm
  - Future 2nd and 4th is GOLD for Sinclair/Phillips -- Brendan, 29/05/21 10:22am
    - Well, that is the way things go isn't it -- D9, 29/05/21 2:54pm
Warriors happy to vote on any potential rule changes -- tenderWARRIOR, 28/05/21 6:50pm
- Cheers! (NT) -- Brendan (mods), 29/05/21 10:23am
Why is it such a big deal? -- Slade, 31/05/21 3:13pm

Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.