VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Saturday, May 10, 09:12:17amLogin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]
Subject: Logic stew


Author:
Damoclese
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03/22/04 3:28pm
In reply to: Wade A. Tisthammer 's message, "Not Tristram Shandy again..." on 03/22/04 10:27am

>
>That's true, but that doesn't imply that you'll never
>reach the end, unless you actually halve your
>distance at each step.


Sure it does. You wouldn't even have to halve it. You'd simply have to travel all those distances less than 1/8, which I think you'll find to be infinite.



>
>Perhaps the Shandy argument is flawed. But since it
>is deductivley valid, the only way it can fail
>is if one of the premises fail. Perhaps a premise
>does fail. But that would require some clear and
>specific justification, not just some vague assertions
>about calculus, ignorance, knowing the unknowable, or
>anything of the sort.

When I clearly understand what in the world a beginningless task is logically, and when I understand what it means for the past to be infinite and am not simply talking through my hat as it were about what their nature might logically be, I'll be more than happy to pick a premise and show you why it's in error.

Until such a time, I think the conclusion is highly disputable, and any attempt to promote it as something that must be true in reality is foolishness.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Invalid logic.Wade A. Tisthammer03/23/04 8:17pm


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.