| Subject |
Author |
Date |
| Two big turds with some corn mixed in with it. | Mr Hankey | 19:18:48 12/12/02 Thu |
- You guys dont have a CLUE as to what the difference between GROSS to NET horsepower is, never mind what the difference between how your shit dont stink, next to mine! never the less I have the balls to post my name beside my post! (NT) -- Chris, 19:37:54 12/12/02 Thu
- Voice of reason -- Bearhawke in Az, 20:14:01 12/12/02 Thu
- Now let's talk about his car BONE stock, no "lil mods" such as exhausts, ignition, K & N filter, spreadbore carb, or the like! Compare it to a car that weighs & 700 POUNDS LESS!!!!!! and has much more horsepower, which corellates with torque, 11.3:1 compression, SEVERELLY UNDER-RATED by Ford at 370 HP in 1971 as ALL the Mfrs were doing dyno'd at 425 HP. 1/4 mile, 0-60MPH, 0-100, top end, what's say? -- That's great, Bearhawke! Is that really your name?, 20:39:20 12/12/02 Thu
- Make sure you use your Blue light though... -- Captain Lightning, 20:51:09 12/12/02 Thu
- I'm terribly soory that I don't meet with your HIGH standards! I mean, those '73 - '78 Fords and MoPars wrere scrfeamers, they have to be, because I'm saying they're not, isn't that the deal, BEAR Hawke? "ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL " is the "key" ....and it's NOT! (NT) -- Well, la, de , da, Mr. high fallutin', rootin', tootin', 08:11:27 12/13/02 Fri
- almost 700 lbs of weight more, both of you idiots seem to bed avoiding that issue! And 3.5 points in Compr4ession, coupled with the CJ/SCJ head design, a better GM Quadra-Jet spreadbore carburetor, higher octane fuel, more efficient exhausts and NO emmissions, never mind the real difference of about 140-150 HP AT THE REAR WHEELS, ( . ) will amount to a hell of a lot more than one (1) SEC. IN THE 1/4, 0-60mph, OR ANYWAY you may want to slice the cake! (NT) -- Well, la, de , da, Mr. high fallutin', rootin', tootin', 08:18:35 12/13/02 Fri
- I didn't think that taking sides for the sake of taking sides, or to remain popular with all of your "friends" here was your style, Bearhawke. And, I know your real name, where you work and live in AZ, what you do, what your wife does, etc. We've conversed many times via email As I too have your email address.I just can't believe that you're so UN-knowledgable on the subject of the 429 CJ P.I. car vs. the de-compressed, under-powered boats mfr'd from '73-'78. I ought to go out to AZ and do a torque stand, and hole shot in your garage bay, and I'll SHOW you ONE SECOND! (NT) -- Well, la, de , da, Mr. high fallutin', rootin', tootin', 08:27:38 12/13/02 Fri
- OI dijn't know you talk ONLY with REAL COPS!!!!! Is that like, I was never good enough to be one, just to fix their cars, but if I hang out with them and agree with them on even the absurd, I'll feel like one of them and they'll "accept" ma as one of them. Sounds like a PROBLEM! I never liked guys like you, who hang off the trials, tribulations, and accomplishments of others. Can you say psychologically unbalanced and emotionally malnourished in your own right? (NT) -- Well, la, de , da, Mr. high fallutin', rootin', tootin', 08:33:51 12/13/02 Fri
- I stand by my previous post concerning ca. 1973-78 Fords and MoPars, not 1971 429 SCJ cars..........and, BTW: even the 2-3 point loss in compression cost less tha one second in the 1/4: all things otherwise equal. :) ps. what kind of fool would I be to post my real name here? Those posters who ARE real cops here; some of them DO have my real name/e mail address...........end of discussion (NT) -- Bearhawke in Az, 21:03:56 12/12/02 Thu
- z rated police radials.. My car still has the FACTORY COP tires on it! and it runs 15's THANX -- Chris, 21:55:39 12/12/02 Thu
- So do you guys use air or other gases in your tires? (NT) -- Mr. Amoco, 22:07:21 12/12/02 Thu
- right,..originally cop tires! From 1978? Well, isn't that remarkable, no dry rot up in Canada, huh? Bias ply, real reliable, great handlers too, as I recall! What planet are yopu from,......( . )??????? (NT) -- dream on little Canadian dreamer,......dream on!, 08:38:48 12/13/02 Fri
- Hey Bearhawke.. just think about this.. from a cruise speed 35 mph's, then drop your gas foot to the floor, and hang on cause the rear tires WILL break loose, its an awesome feeling! and you should see the looks on other cruise night cruisers beside me LOL! (NT) -- Chris, 22:07:25 12/12/02 Thu
- ...especially with those 1972 P.I heads, and that high rise, spreadbore Holley 1150 double pumper, HiPo ignition, headers, 3" pipes, flowmastersk, K &N, filter, High lift, hi-po cam, those 11.3:1 pistons, 3.91:1 Detroit lockers posi, .......all stock, right? I could get my little red wagon to do that too, if I put all of that shit on it!!!! (NT) -- Yeah, it must really rip roar......, 08:43:40 12/13/02 Fri
- someone is lying and Bs'ing, here, and it's not me! Check with some other FREAL Ford P.I experts, some who have driven both cars , or who own both cars, they'll tell you what a BIG difference there is! (NT) -- well, Mr. Hankey, or whatever the hell your REAL name is!, 20:22:43 12/12/02 Thu
- someone is lying and Bs'ing, here, and it's not me! Check with some other REAL Ford P.I experts, some who have driven both cars , or who own both cars, they'll tell you what a BIG difference there is! This supercharged nut-job from Canada is as dumb as a box of rocks! (NT) -- well, Mr. Hankey, or whatever the hell your REAL name is!, 20:24:02 12/12/02 Thu
|
|
| and for anyone that owns a Ford P.I car from the '70s, you make us all look bad! Take your P.OS> 460 P.I> car and run it off a cliff and do us all a big favor! Let it Rest in Peace, ( . )!!!! (NT) | and I am embarrassed for you ( . ) | 20:19:45 12/12/02 Thu |
|
|
Feedback: 