VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:02:18 01/24/14 Fri
Author: Lazlo
Author Host/IP: adsl-99-0-82-49.dsl.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net / 99.0.82.49
Subject: Re: Anna Wohlin article from July 2013
In reply to: Linda 's message, "Re: Anna Wohlin article from July 2013" on 05:04:04 01/24/14 Fri

" if you ever saw the funeral pictures, you'd notice Anna allows Frank to put his arm around her. Would she do that if she knew he'd killed him? "

Linda, I'm pretty sure you are referring to the inquest photos of Frank and Anna. I don't believe Anna was even at Brian's funeral, but your point is still valid about the photos.


"The only facts are he drowned in an unlikely place with people all around him, everyone had a different story as to what happened, and none of it matched the evidence."

True dat Linda! What I find even more ridiculous about Anna's latest regurgitation's of her tired old story is, several new facts have come to light (Keylock being present at Cotchford when Brian died - his own admission, Lawson saying her statement was all lies). These facts directly discount her version of how things happened, yet she either naively or blatantly ignores this. She's either not paying attention or has told her lies so many times, she now believes it as true. Janet Lawson didn't come clean, but at least she "updated" her story so to speak, to fall more in line with the truth. Like I originally posted here, Anna should follow suit or go away.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
 Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.