- big bopper exhumed in perfect condition -- Kevin Randall, 16:03:23 08/21/08 Thu (101.sub-75-197-162.myvzw.com/75.197.162.101)
here's awierd article about the big bopper who died with buddy holly on feb 3rd 1959-the big bopper's son was born after he died and hd him exhumed, and he got to see him and said that he was like perfectly preserved for dying like 9 years ago and sure this is morbid but it shows that there can be a very good chance that brian would be in like perfect condition if he was exhumed as he was buried depper where it's colder and 10 year after the big bopper.the weird story about the big bopper's cakset is that they put it on display in a museum in texas after they put the big bopper in a new casket-yes dislpaying his casket that he was in for 49 years seems alittle strange! here's alink to 2 articles:
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/article/50710/display-meant-to-revive-interest-in-big-bopper/
http://www.joesherlock.com/Bopper.html
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Re: big bopper exhumed in perfect condition -- Kevin Randall, 03:54:41 08/22/08 Fri (9.sub-70-211-174.myvzw.com/70.211.174.9)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Gerry, 06:15:00 08/23/08 Sat (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Kevin Randall, 09:16:39 08/23/08 Sat (221.sub-70-211-18.myvzw.com/70.211.18.221)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Sioux, 16:53:20 08/23/08 Sat (pool-70-16-247-44.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.247.44)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Philip, 00:43:06 08/24/08 Sun (host86-169-83-73.range86-169.btcentralplus.com/86.169.83.73)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Leenda, 11:10:13 08/24/08 Sun (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Delilah, 16:48:27 08/24/08 Sun (bas14-montrealak-1177841755.dsl.bell.ca/70.52.112.91)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Leenda, 20:24:35 08/24/08 Sun (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- ANN for DELILAH, 02:07:07 08/25/08 Mon (NoHost/212.230.223.65)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Delilah, 04:33:28 08/25/08 Mon (bas10-montreal02-1177590796.dsl.bell.ca/70.48.156.12)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Sioux, 06:17:35 08/25/08 Mon (pool-70-16-247-44.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.247.44)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Anny, 07:29:33 08/25/08 Mon (4.Red-88-24-226.staticIP.rima-tde.net/88.24.226.4)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Leenda (Linda), 14:38:28 08/25/08 Mon (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Delilah, 15:28:00 08/25/08 Mon (bas14-montrealak-1177841505.dsl.bell.ca/70.52.111.97)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Leenda (Linda), 14:36:15 08/25/08 Mon (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Hibblette, 09:05:45 08/25/08 Mon (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Kevin Randall, 13:46:47 08/25/08 Mon (32.sub-75-197-159.myvzw.com/75.197.159.32)
- Re: Philip and Kevin -- Philip, 03:40:22 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- Those that were there???? -- Hibblette, 14:55:41 08/26/08 Tue (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: pathology report -- Philip, 04:22:14 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- Re: pathology report -- kevin randall, 06:40:28 08/26/08 Tue (239.sub-75-197-16.myvzw.com/75.197.16.239)
- Re: pathology report -- Kevin Randall, 07:19:35 08/26/08 Tue (239.sub-75-197-16.myvzw.com/75.197.16.239)
- Re: pathology report -- Philip, 09:45:27 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- Re: pathology report -- Hibblette, 15:04:24 08/26/08 Tue (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: pathology report -- Philip, 09:59:22 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- Yeah, but the report omits the cause of death... -- Arnie, 10:16:34 08/26/08 Tue (cache-mtc-ae09.proxy.aol.com/64.12.117.13)
- Re: pathology report Where's the rest of it? -- pam, 11:46:57 08/26/08 Tue (nc-67-77-134-10.sta.embarqhsd.net/67.77.134.10)
- Re: pathology report -- Hibblette, 14:59:34 08/26/08 Tue (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: pathology report -- Philip, 15:27:58 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- to gerry/pam!? -- Philip, 16:57:46 08/26/08 Tue (host86-170-30-143.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.30.143)
- Re: gerry/pam -- Gerry, 18:36:44 08/26/08 Tue (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
- Re: gerry/pam -- pam, 19:21:32 08/26/08 Tue (75-139-114-198.dhcp.mant.nc.charter.com/75.139.114.198)
- Re: gerry/pam -- Gerry, 19:46:01 08/26/08 Tue (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
- Re: gerry/pam -- ANN, 09:27:33 08/27/08 Wed (NoHost/212.230.220.121)
- Re: gerry/pam -- Kevin Randall, 08:12:03 08/28/08 Thu (125.sub-75-197-126.myvzw.com/75.197.126.125)
- For Kevin, again: -- Arnie, 09:36:12 08/28/08 Thu (cache-mtc-ae09.proxy.aol.com/64.12.117.13)
- Re: gerry/pam -- ANN for KEVIN, 09:57:55 08/28/08 Thu (NoHost/212.230.223.104)
- Re: Kevin -- pam, 12:31:45 08/28/08 Thu (nc-67-77-134-10.sta.embarqhsd.net/67.77.134.10)
- Re: Kevin -- Kevin Randall, 12:49:30 08/28/08 Thu (151.sub-70-211-208.myvzw.com/70.211.208.151)
- Re: Kevin -- Linda, 13:52:38 08/28/08 Thu (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: gerry/pam -- Kevin Randall, 13:20:59 08/28/08 Thu (135.sub-75-196-11.myvzw.com/75.196.11.135)
- Re: big bopper exhumed in perfect condition -- kevin Randall, 22:24:36 08/29/08 Fri (214.sub-75-196-145.myvzw.com/75.196.145.214)
- How About a NEW Brian Pic Thread? -- Delilah, 07:02:10 08/01/08 Fri (bas10-montreal02-1177591559.dsl.bell.ca/70.48.159.7)
With our old pic thread now on page 2 of the archives (along with most of our other "current" threads), I felt like starting a new one. I had been thinking about it anyway, because the original one had become so huge I was having trouble finding my way around. And I probably wasn't the only one.
Here's the last one I posted to the old thread, more as a kind of test to see if it would go through. It did, but all kinds of weird things started happening and I though I had crashed the board again, all by myself! :(
Again, for anyone who would like to post photos but has never done it, here's what to do:
You need a "host" site for you photo. There are a bunch of free ones that you can choose from. A very popular one is www.photobucket.com. Another one that I know of is imageshack.
You then need to upload your pic from your computer to your host site. Just follow the prompts from the site. Once this is done, copy the HTML Code link, and paste it into your message.
It may sound complicated, but once you try it, you'll see just how easy it actually is. :)
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Exhibition in London - Brian Content -- Delilah, 08:41:33 08/20/08 Wed (bas10-montreal02-1177591200.dsl.bell.ca/70.48.157.160)
For anyone who lives in or around London, or who will be there at some point between now and mid-October, you may want to take some time to pop over to Camden, if you are so inclined, and have a look at a new exhibition called "Forever 27". It is exactly what you think it is.
Forever 27 exhibition
Vid from the BBC. Notice how the guy correctly names Brian as the founder of the Stones (that's a hint, Keith...).
From what could be seen in the video, these Brian pics all have been seen times and times again before. Still, it could be interesting. And there are the other guys as well.
Anyway, I'm giving it to you FWIW. I found the links on IORR.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Kevin Randall, 09:59:23 08/08/08 Fri (214.sub-75-199-106.myvzw.com/75.199.106.214)
Check this out- here's a qoute from Keith saying who started the band from Bill's book and this is also quoted on the rock n roll hall inductee:
Keith Richards is clear about whose band it was in the beginning: “Brian was really fantastic, the first person I ever heard playing slide electric guitar,” Richards said in Stone Alone: The Story of a Rock ’n’ Roll Band, by Bill Wyman. “Mick and I both thought he was incredible. He mentioned he was forming a band. He could have easily joined another group, but he wanted to form his own. The Rolling Stones was Brian’s baby.”
Here's the Rocknroll hall inductee source link:
http://www.rockhall.com/inductee/the-rolling-stones
Now on the Keith Richards website in the ask Keith section,on question number #67,a fan asked about Stu and here's what Keith said about Stu:
In fact,he was the leader of the Rolling Stones.He was the former,he formed it,you know? And it's his band.
Talk about revisionism! First keef say's it was Brian's baby then says it was Stu's band,it's sounds more like let's erase Brian from history(discredit him)-I say give credit where credit is due!
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Delilah, 13:39:24 08/08/08 Fri (bas10-montreal02-1177590940.dsl.bell.ca/70.48.156.156)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Sioux, 12:41:35 08/09/08 Sat (pool-70-16-236-163.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.236.163)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Kevin Randall, 16:28:05 08/09/08 Sat (165.sub-70-208-151.myvzw.com/70.208.151.165)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Delilah, 05:36:02 08/10/08 Sun (bas10-montreal02-1177591430.dsl.bell.ca/70.48.158.134)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Krose, 14:09:04 08/10/08 Sun (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Huh? -- Arnie, 11:51:36 08/11/08 Mon (cache-dtc-ae11.proxy.aol.com/205.188.117.15)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 02:48:40 08/12/08 Tue (156.sub-75-198-29.myvzw.com/75.198.29.156)
- Re: Huh? -- Sioux, 06:09:15 08/12/08 Tue (pool-70-16-231-10.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.231.10)
- Re: Huh? -- Arnie, 09:41:46 08/12/08 Tue (cache-mtc-ae09.proxy.aol.com/64.12.117.13)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 11:50:52 08/12/08 Tue (115.sub-75-199-7.myvzw.com/75.199.7.115)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 02:18:14 08/13/08 Wed (40.sub-75-197-107.myvzw.com/75.197.107.40)
- Re: Huh? -- Arnie, 09:54:02 08/13/08 Wed (cache-dtc-ae11.proxy.aol.com/205.188.117.15)
- Re: Huh? -- Ann, 03:30:42 08/13/08 Wed (NoHost/212.230.218.126)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 06:06:26 08/13/08 Wed (19.sub-75-199-123.myvzw.com/75.199.123.19)
- Re: Huh? -- Sioux, 20:28:52 08/14/08 Thu (pool-70-16-231-10.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.231.10)
- Re: Huh? -- kevin Randall, 00:37:36 08/24/08 Sun (68.sub-75-198-146.myvzw.com/75.198.146.68)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 11:57:03 08/12/08 Tue (115.sub-75-199-7.myvzw.com/75.199.7.115)
- Re: Huh? -- Hibblette, 19:37:56 08/12/08 Tue (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 06:10:24 08/13/08 Wed (19.sub-75-199-123.myvzw.com/75.199.123.19)
- Re: Huh? -- Hibblette, 14:05:43 08/13/08 Wed (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: Huh? -- Krose, 17:52:51 08/13/08 Wed (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: Huh? -- Krose (Clarifying Statement), 19:30:01 08/13/08 Wed (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: Huh? -- Linda, 20:54:27 08/13/08 Wed (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Huh? -- Delilah, 04:29:27 08/14/08 Thu (bas14-montrealak-1177640922.dsl.bell.ca/70.49.95.218)
- Re: Huh? -- Krose, 14:08:18 08/14/08 Thu (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: Huh? -- George (Bahh, Behh!!), 16:43:35 08/14/08 Thu (c-71-207-133-91.hsd1.va.comcast.net/71.207.133.91)
- Re: Huh? -- Ann, 03:04:58 08/15/08 Fri (NoHost/212.230.222.13)
- Re: Huh? -- Mellotronic, 07:20:30 08/15/08 Fri (host86-170-59-24.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.59.24)
- Re: Huh? -- George, 17:01:45 08/19/08 Tue (c-71-207-133-91.hsd1.va.comcast.net/71.207.133.91)
- Re: Huh? -- Mellotronic, 20:31:03 08/19/08 Tue (host86-170-235-43.range86-170.btcentralplus.com/86.170.235.43)
- Re: Huh? -- Sioux, 10:04:10 08/23/08 Sat (pool-70-16-247-44.rich.east.verizon.net/70.16.247.44)
- Re: Huh? -- Leenda, 10:50:54 08/23/08 Sat (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Huh? -- Krose, 14:06:53 08/14/08 Thu (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: Huh? -- Linda, 20:47:21 08/13/08 Wed (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Huh? -- Delilah, 04:33:29 08/14/08 Thu (bas14-montrealak-1177640922.dsl.bell.ca/70.49.95.218)
- Re: Huh? -- Hibblette, 07:48:23 08/14/08 Thu (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: Huh? -- Krose, 14:09:30 08/14/08 Thu (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: Huh? -- Ann, 02:59:21 08/15/08 Fri (NoHost/212.230.222.13)
- Re: Huh? -- Linda, 21:01:54 08/15/08 Fri (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Huh? -- Kevin Randall, 01:35:36 08/24/08 Sun (68.sub-75-198-146.myvzw.com/75.198.146.68)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- George, 16:08:23 08/09/08 Sat (c-71-207-133-91.hsd1.va.comcast.net/71.207.133.91)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Hibblette, 19:27:37 08/12/08 Tue (76-253-175-146.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net/76.253.175.146)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Scott Hardie (A Brian Jones Fan), 20:57:35 08/12/08 Tue (NoHost/142.104.179.35)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- mcme (Topshelf), 08:26:43 08/16/08 Sat (nme-nxg-pr6.tpgi.com.au/220.245.179.136)
- Re: revisionism on who started the band! WTF?? -- Marcus, 21:00:59 08/19/08 Tue (cache-dtc-ae11.proxy.aol.com/205.188.117.15)
- Hello! -- Mark, 16:19:31 08/16/08 Sat (CPE0007955c4005-CM001947481dca.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com/99.244.225.238)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EctiBPNcGgg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXIpR3InjiQ-Got Live If You Want It Ep. Side 1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGaf5IbyY_I -Got Live If You Want It Ep. Side 2.
Mark
Ps- I was wondering if Delilah could post those High Tide and Green Grass pictures again. I never got a chance to see them when the board went down. And I was interested in seeing them, because High Tide and Green Grass was the first Rolling Stones album I ever bought.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Krose -- Us ,Them and Us/Them (Peace In Jonesville), 06:52:08 08/15/08 Fri (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
Everyone,
We need to stop this. The whole thing is becoming increasingly convoluted; feelings are getting hurt, assumptions are being made and accusations are flying while intent is being distorted. We have an ugly “us” “them” and “us/them” scenario but I think we can still have peace. We need peace in all districts of Jonesville. Just imagine how we all look to the “anti-Brianists” right now. Let’s drop the discussion about the other sites, get back to Brian Jones and accept both the different approaches each board has to said subject and those who like to contribute to all sites.
For those currently locked in a two way battle of words maybe you should resolve your argument through IMs or else go to Second Life, get avatars and have a virtual smack down at dawn. (lol)
The message I wrote about group dynamics was about Brian Jones but it happens to be so common an experience that many of us have seen it in our own lives. I was writing with the intent that this should be taken into account when reading negativity about Brian; I think it is overlooked. There’s nothing inherently wrong with looking at the negative stories, I don’t think that looking at them means that Brian is being trashed. I do think these stories need to be examined in perspective and should not be the overriding theme because they can be corrosive. One needs to be careful when delving into this sort of thing because one can easily become cynical about Brian in any subsequent anecdote. Just in case anyone misunderstood; I was not accusing any board of groupthink or being sheep; someone else responded with an experience of their own and it happened to be about another site and things flowed from there.
BTW: Both sites have their merits, on one there are many references about Brian from many publications, that is attractive. While the other site is largely unstructured and that too is attractive. As for the other two boards that I know of; I've never posted to IORR and I've only read it a few times. I regularly scan RO but I have never posted to that site either. To Peace In Jonesville.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Re: Peace in Jonesville -- Delilah, 06:24:11 08/16/08 Sat (bas14-montrealak-1177640722.dsl.bell.ca/70.49.95.18)
- Re: Krose -- Sioux, 12:10:39 08/16/08 Sat (pool-71-253-142-110.rich.east.verizon.net/71.253.142.110)
- Re: Krose -- Linda, 19:11:08 08/18/08 Mon (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: Krose -- Gerry, 14:02:13 08/19/08 Tue (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
- Re: Krose -- Kevin Randall, 14:37:38 08/19/08 Tue (105.sub-75-199-135.myvzw.com/75.199.135.105)
- Wake up -- Arnie, 14:44:04 08/19/08 Tue (cache-dtc-ae11.proxy.aol.com/205.188.117.15)
- Re: I don't know what this is all about -- Delilah, 14:49:16 08/19/08 Tue (bas14-montrealak-1177842087.dsl.bell.ca/70.52.113.167)
- Re: Krose -- Delilah, 15:33:38 08/19/08 Tue (bas14-montrealak-1177842087.dsl.bell.ca/70.52.113.167)
- Re: Krose -- Linda, 16:34:29 08/19/08 Tue (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: ok..everyone has had their say...end of subject.. -- Gerry, 18:46:01 08/19/08 Tue (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
- Dumb question about Kool Rock Star Hair Styles, -- Marcus (Long Time Fan), 22:01:19 08/17/08 Sun (cache-dtc-ae11.proxy.aol.com/205.188.117.15)
Dumb question here, off the beaten path, I know but I was born in the Mid 50's and wanted desperately to have the Kool ala Beatleesque,Stonesesque Hair styles in the 60's, But I have hair just like Ben Stillers, curly, poofy, hard to get a comb through it. I tried Hot combs, Hair jells nothing worked, I gave up. My question is I thought hair type will follow You through out Your life, mine is still the same. Keith had really smooth straight hair in the 60's and 70's like Brians but darker, then suddenly sometime in the 80's He transformed into Ben Stiller, really curly poofy hair what happened? can drugs change your hair DNA? just curious, anybody know?
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Brian -- Christy (Sad), 20:58:28 08/17/08 Sun (68-118-91-87.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com/68.118.91.87)
I think that is unfortunate that such a great talent was lost at such a young age. However, I admire him for his musical talent, only.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
- JOUJOUKA -- LEO-ELL, 13:58:57 08/05/08 Tue (host86-150-172-80.range86-150.btcentralplus.com/86.150.172.80)
Can i just say had a great time in joujouka, bou jouloud, anita pallenberg was there john dunbar, b attar came as well hey brenda anita knows a little bit more than you sweetee, the real musicians live in joujouka
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Ann, 05:21:30 08/06/08 Wed (NoHost/212.230.223.68)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Leenda, 21:26:37 08/11/08 Mon (75-130-210-31.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com/75.130.210.31)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Krose, 13:46:04 08/14/08 Thu (pool-96-238-84-35.nrflva.fios.verizon.net/96.238.84.35)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Master Musicains of Joujouka, 09:10:14 08/16/08 Sat (proxya.tcd.ie/134.226.1.234)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Sioux, 12:22:54 08/16/08 Sat (pool-71-253-142-110.rich.east.verizon.net/71.253.142.110)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- ww.joujouka.net, 14:15:52 08/16/08 Sat (86-42-94-135.b-ras1.blp.dublin.eircom.net/86.42.94.135)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Ann, 02:25:57 08/17/08 Sun (NoHost/212.230.222.158)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- bronxal, 12:41:56 08/17/08 Sun (ip68-96-98-161.lv.lv.cox.net/68.96.98.161)
- Re: JOUJOUKA -- Sioux, 13:21:04 08/17/08 Sun (pool-71-253-142-110.rich.east.verizon.net/71.253.142.110)
- Brian Jones 40th Anniversary festival -- Master Musicains of Joujouka, 08:47:58 08/16/08 Sat (proxypac.tcd.ie/134.226.1.234)
Reports and photos from Brian Jones 40th
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=58849694&blogID=422214485
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=58849694&blogID=422584159
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
- Keith played slide on Little Red Rooster?!! -- Kevin Randall, 09:46:14 08/08/08 Fri (214.sub-75-199-106.myvzw.com/75.199.106.214)
check this out: a legit review on the rolling stones lp 'The Rolling Stones Now' states that Keith played slide on Little Red Rooster(no mention of Brian)-This is BS & messed up!like Brian didn't exhist,here's the quote from the product description:
On "What a Shame", the Stones prove that they don'thave to look to outside sources for their blues. Keith's penetrating slide here, as on "Little Red Rooster", foreshadows greater things to come.
what a total crock of shit!and here's a link to the source -it's amazon.uk!!!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rolling-Stones-Now/dp/B00006L9SH
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- British pathe mellotron mark II demo(same as Brian's) -- Kevin Randall, 21:31:46 08/06/08 Wed (33.sub-75-197-219.myvzw.com/75.197.219.33)
Here's cheesy British Pathe demo of the Mellotron Mark II organ from around 1965-it's the same organ model that Brian later used on 'We love you' and '2000 light years from home' the demo is so bad it's good(LOL)I thought that some of you might get a kick out of it if not the guys cheesy grin at the end(grins)also a awesome 4 part demo of the mellotron,again the same model as Brian used so you can hear the great sounds one could achieve from it like Brian did.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrXtmKGkSa4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=re1ZVfFY8Uc
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=gSdvnKaTs4o&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watchv=Lr79dK4T0lc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AHrMQa-Iro&feature=related
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Was Brian There or Not? -- Delilah, 12:08:48 08/06/08 Wed (bas14-montrealak-1177841231.dsl.bell.ca/70.52.110.79)
This being a perfectly dreary, rainy day, I'm sitting at the computer fooling around, with my (burned) copy of The Chess Sessions keeping me musically entertained. And something just struck me as odd.
I have read many times that the instrumental Stewed and Keefed is subtitled Brian's Blues because Brian was out ill on that day. Yet he obviously played on the three other tracks from that day featured on the CD (I Can't Be Satisfied, It's All Over Now and Time Is on My Side - all three are the officially released versions).
So, was Brian there that day or did he miss the session due to illness? Was he out only in the morning or in the afternoon? Did he become ill and walked out just prior to Stu and Keith starting to play the instrumental?
I'm really puzzled by this.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- No Expectations-slide guitar?-Brian,Ry,Dave? -- Kevin Randall, 22:09:44 08/09/08 Sat (135.sub-75-199-19.myvzw.com/75.199.19.135)
Here's another one on the web to confuse fans!
On this site about Beggars Banquet,next to the listing track of No Expectations it has (Ry Cooder Slide guitar?)click on it where it says Ry Cooder and when you read about No Expectations it says:
Under the influence of the great Robert Johnson, "No Expectations" became the band's signature soulful blues numbers. The return of the slide guitar was as welcome as it was unexpected. While recording Beggars Banquet, the Stones made a virtue of using guest musicians, including virtuoso guitarist Ry Cooder, then all but unknown to the public, and Dave Mason of Traffic. Both of them, as well as Brian Jones, recorded slide-guitar parts for "No Expectations," and nobody involved seems very clear on whose recording was used on the released version.
So basically this is just another one to discredit Brian again by saying nobody involved seems very clear weather it was Brian,Ry or Dave Mason's slide recording used on No Expectations! We all know it was Brian! here's the link:
http://www.rylanders.free-online.co.uk/RySite/RyPages/BeggarsBanquet.html#factory
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Board Problems...and New Board..Please Read -- Gerry, 11:39:34 07/29/08 Tue (cpe-72-231-218-142.buffalo.res.rr.com/72.231.218.142)
Well people, someone has been at it again. Sunday I came on to approve messages and bogus code was on here. I had to back up messages and do a message rebuild. For whatever reason, the message rebuild shifted everything to archive 2. Don't panic ladies (and gents), your pictures are all here but in archive 2. Basically the main page is starting over as blank except for this post. I pity the fool who is doing this if I ever lay my hands on you!!! Creepazoid!
And miracle of miracles, I heard from Voy. I don't want to say too much but yes, this is intentional.
If you go to the archives, archive 1 is blank..it is not supposed to be like that. Your pictures and the former main page start in archive 2.
Now, let me tell you now..as good a time as any I guess, that we will have a new message board up and going within the next few weeks or less. There will be 5 moderators so I get a break. You will need to register, which is no big deal. For example, El who doesn't wish to give his real name can register as El. Please note:We will have stickys at the top of the page and the first one will be the rules and regulations. These are the provider of the boards rules and regs, they will be STRICTLY enforced and you will be banned if you decide you want to see how far out of line you can step. No more playing around. Most of you are good people and want to discuss Brian but we have a few who are "shit stirrers" as I call them..want to argue, want to flame others, etc. Not on the new board. Follow the rules or it's bye bye time. I have been far too liberal in letting certain posts go thru over the last few years in an attempt to be fair to everyone but this foolishness that has been going on has got to stop...and it will. We'd like to get the board back to what it once was. And I would ask those folks out there..the oldtimers who wrote me (or didn't but are reading the board still) and said well, I won't post because of fighting etc., please come back and jump in. By so many good folks leaving it has drastically affected the tone of the board. If you don't jump in there and engage in some interesting topics, can you really blame me? I've only been able to work with what I've got. So we're going to come down hard on those who abuse the board rules and hope you in turn will return and help to make this a board to once again be proud of...and we hope those of you folks already here, will enjoy your new board.
We have also set up other areas for political discussions, other music topics or groups, and an area for all other unrelated topics. So you've got quite abit of leeway for topics. And we have unlimited archives!
This board will be left up to redirect people but once we post the address for the new board here, PLEASE bookmark it and post on the new board. We're still "tweaking" things abit and will let you know as soon as possible when we're ready to go.
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
Replies:
- Joujouka -- Sioux, 17:10:08 08/06/08 Wed (pool-68-238-24-5.rich.east.verizon.net/68.238.24.5)
Glad you are back, LEO-ELL. :) We'd love to hear details, when you have the time!!
[ Post a Reply to this Message ][Edit]
