VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:48:04 07/20/08 Sun
Author: Kristen
Subject: Ok I voted Jubes ;-) BUT I do have to say that I did not like this ep at all- Mac SO got the raw end of the deal in this... as for Singer, guess payback was hell as her character was eventually killed off! LOL
In reply to: Jubellant 's message, "Suggestions are up for Favourite Mac Visual and Favourite Mac Quote for this week's episode 'Drop Zone'. Scroll down and vote if you choose. Voting ends Sunday at midnight ET." on 20:07:55 07/19/08 Sat


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

[> [> I was just so disappointed that Chegwidden did not back Mac up and investigate a little more about how the mishap Part B got in her car. I just thought that after all Mac had been through and fact that she had really gone by the book after misleading the court, a vote of confidence about her integrity would have done wonders for her morale and she would not have gone trapsing to Australia giving Mic false hope (as much as I loved the guy)) -- Jubellant, 18:50:53 07/20/08 Sun


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> I hated the fact that AJ refused to back Mac up & then treated her like garbage by removing her & of course giving the case to Harm so he could once again swoop in & save the day. All AJ had to do was ask Gunny, because Gunny had developed the information through his investigation (which Mac told him to do) & the information in the file was basically useless. Of course when Harm betrayed a clients trust by looking at classified information (Redemption) AJ backed him to the hilt, but of course he'd never do the same thing for Mac. That's why I didn't vote Jubellant, sorry, but this was another let's-slap-Mac-down episodes, & it isn't very high on my list. Its too bad Mac wasn't allowed to nail Singer, but of course that wasn't going to happen either. Sigh... -- Jennifer, 08:28:30 07/21/08 Mon


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> I perfectly understand how you feel Jennifer but that is why I grew to love Mac so much. In spite of life's smackdowns she brushed herself off and kept going. Some people in life never seem to catch a break and have to struggle for everything they have while others just seem to sail on through. In spite of her competence and integrity she got some pretty lame cases, dogs, polygamists, dolphins, peeping toms, overweight sailors etc., things a junior should have handled. Vukovic waltzes in and gets prime cases and praise for his crappy ethics! Kind of reminds me of how no one clamored for Huckabee to get out of the race when he was light years behind McCain but they hurled everything but the kitchen sink at the woman who was miles closer to get lost! I wonder what they were so afraid of? -- Jubellant, 13:46:08 07/23/08 Wed


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Well in all fairness in the election, Huckabee did bow out when it was very clear he wouldn't have enough votes or delegates he did get out. The problem I had with Hilary is she tried to change the rules when she ended up losing (i.e. Michigan & Florida) & even when it was clear she wasn't going get the delegates she wouldn't quit. I think the whole thing was a mess from the beginning, but it was entertaining to follow LOL! -- Jennifer, 09:23:21 07/26/08 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> You're wrong Jennifer -- p, 22:37:31 07/26/08 Sat

Hilliary didn't change the rules, The DNC changed the rules. Michigan and Florida wanted their primaries to count and be more important.

They didn't want their primaries to at a time when the race was over.

The Dmocratic party is the party of SPECIAL INTEREST. They don't care for the average person anymore.

Women were IMPORTANT to them in the Eighties, but not now.

They want the Blacks, Queers, and Hispanic vote.

Hillary would have won the nomination, but they didn't want Bill involve in their politics anymore.

If they wanted a woman, then Michigan and Florida would have counted. They didn't want a woman.

They wanted a black man. They needed to reward the black voters who have voted for the Democratic Party for the last fifty or so years.

She should have sued the party to get the votes.



By the way I hate all things Clinton, but she was screwed out of the nomination because of her sex and she isn't in one of their special interest groups.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> P don't come here and tell me I'm wrong....Inside.... -- Jennifer, 09:35:50 07/27/08 Sun

First, Michigan and Florida decided to move up their primary dates against the rules set forth by the DNC, and it was AGREED upon by ALL candidates, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, a YEAR before the primaries that Florida and Michigan's votes WOULD NOT COUNT. They ALL agreed upon this fact, so much so as to where Hillary's name was the only name on the ballot in Michigan, because the others knew well in advance that the votes wouldn't count. This wasn't done on a whim, it was decided upon well in advance that Michigan and Florida would be sanctioned. Michigan and Florida played a gamble, tried to force the issue so they could claim some glory, and it backfired. The DNC wasn't out to get Hillary, it was something all agreed upon....

Hillary was all in agreement with this UNTIL she started losing...when it was clear that she wasn't going to win the nomination, then it became so important to her that Michigan and Florida be counted, Michigan counted AS IS where her name was the only name on the ballot. How fair is that to try and change the game mid-stream? If either candidate had protested the sanctions when they were first handed down I might agree with you, but they didn't. They AGREED to them, and then the only reason Hillary wanted them counted is because she ended up on the losing end.

I don't want to turn this board into a political one, but I disagree that Hillary was screwed. She ran a piss-poor campaign, she ran out of money (how do you account for that) and she lost the vote. Nobody took it from her, she lost. She figured she'd have things sewn up by Super Tuesday and didn't plan for anything after that, and it did turn into a race and she lost.

But please don't come here telling me I'm wrong....


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> "Average person"? Just so I'm absolutey certain of your point of view, would you mind defining an average person for me, please? -- Carrotts, 10:11:59 07/29/08 Tue


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I'm curious as to the definition as well. -- Jubellant, 16:35:52 08/22/08 Fri


[ Edit | View ]





[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.