Subject: Re: Forgotten anniversaries |
Author: Leo Kerr
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 19:39:47 05/16/15 Sat
In reply to:
Dmitri
's message, "Re: Forgotten anniversaries" on 08:12:41 05/16/15 Sat
it almost sounds like you're proposing... a systemic method of... exploring history.
For an explanatory example, I'm a geography major (not that it shows,) and there were two major ways presented as "how to teach geography" -- one being the style very often taught in middle school: Brazil is the largest country in South America, and it's principal exports are X, and it's principal imports are Y, and the population is Z, and the GDP, is...
Where I went for my degree, "systemic" geography, that of "why" are things there. How does a river (in general) work, that can be applied to, say, that specific river? What sorts of businesses tend to end up at corners, versus mid-block? How far from the city center? And all that jazz. Need to know the number of strawberries exported from California in 2004? Know where/how to find out. (Wow: I was a college junior when Mosaic started showing up in some of the computer labs.. not that there was a lot that could be done with it.)
Applied to history might be interesting. Confusing, difficult, but interesting. Not a collection of names, facts, and dates, but looking at causes, and then being able to try and find such things in, for example, the Battle of Hastings?
Could that *work?* It's a very interesting, curious idea.
Although I have to admit, I'm very cautious about charging, full speed ahead, in to educational experiments. I went through middle and high school as our region was swinging into "whole language". I still had learned the phonic based reading and such, but my learning of base grammar has been dodgy. (Fortunately, at least locally, whole language seems to have been discredited, but I don't know if grammar is making its way back in.)
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|