VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789 ]
Subject: Re: Further analysis


Author:
Starla
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:51:53 03/03/05 Thu
In reply to: RockGroupieCom 's message, "Re: Further analysis" on 17:39:41 03/03/05 Thu

One thing that struck me from hearing Lori M. interviewed was how she was 'afraid' of Pamela. Jim Morrison's girlfriend was intimidated by Pam, too. I can't help but think the guys liked this dichotomy & some may have even promoted it to not only keep the girls in line, but so they could feel the rush & power of being the sought after object. It gave their egos & self-esteem a constant boost, while keeping all the girls close.

It's so interesting that you would bring up the impulsivity of musicians. Despite being 'randy' or 'polygamists', esp. the British ones, seem to like having a main girlfriend. I bring this up, also, b/c of what was said in the two previous posts about ardor & pursuit. This isn't something that's addressed much, rather 'rock star' antics or incidents are.

This is the same situation experienced w/my past love. Calls every night, exchanges of love, reassurance & tears - flying, traveling & meeting all over along w/plans to move in. Then it just stops. Maybe the woman won't phone b/c she feels she should be the one pursued. Then, the next thing you hear is that he's marrying the baby-sitter.

The contrast b/w that & the prior vital furvor of the loving relationship doesn't add up & is hard, if not impossible to reconcile.



>So, when I read your book, things seemed to go from one >quick meeting to a second meeting at a hotel then to a one- >nighter then an invite to England and so forth.

>He apparently started asking Pam DesBarres to marry him back >in the day. From what I've read he strikes me as sort of an >impulsive guy - like a guy who meets a girl and quickly >jumps into "commitment talk" only to back out later. When >reading Pam's book and your book, I got the impression he >was just a guy that liked handing the girls a bunch of lines >to get what he wanted. Nothing struck me as sincere in what
>he was saying.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Further analysisRockGroupieCom10:20:51 03/04/05 Fri
Re: Further analysisBebe10:26:21 03/04/05 Fri


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.