Hey Jackals! Is It "ODD" We Are Silent on Darshanas Manuals of Philosophy? -- Christian Theology Discussion Group

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:49:56 01/01/03 Wed
Author: SOLA SCRIPTURA!
Subject: Hey Jackals! Is It "ODD" We Are Silent on Darshanas Manuals of Philosophy?
In reply to: Sola Scriptura 's message, "The World According To GARP (Theorists)" on 22:46:15 01/01/03 Wed

Has it eclipsed Jack's vigilant notice and keen acumen that:
We have been "silent" on the Darshanas Manuals of Philosophy, too! - Do you find that �odd�, Jack?

We are "silent" on the Bhagavad Gita- fourth discourse, too! � Does THAT seem �odd� to Jack�s reasoning?

We have keep a "silence" about the Svetasvatara Upanishad.....at least since last Tuesday at 7:45 P.M., or was it 1975? - Do you find that �odd�?

Jangler�s Thesis: "Now, everyone knows that the Scofield Reference Bible has long been the study Bible of choice among Baptists,..."

SO WHAT?

It is NOT MY Bible of Choice.

It is NOT anyone on this board's "study Bible of Choice" whether "EVERYBODY KNOWS IT" or NOT!

I have no particular affinity for it, nor has anyone here ever alluded to such. I have already addressed the "Baptist" issue previously for the umpteenth time. Nice dialectical try, Jack. Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis

"It strikes us as odd that they condemn and ridicule Rev. Finis Jennings Dake for teaching the Gap Theory, but remain silent regarding Scofield teaching it."

Relativism at it's finest! We condemn Dake as a Heretic independent of any other issue! We critique Finis Dake on what he has publicly espoused and the example he set, and the live he lived without using the humanistic standard of comparing him to other men. We assail Dake's HERESY because it IS HERESY!! Dake has nothing to do with anyone getting their great toe caught in the bath tub drain. He has nothing to do with Scofield.

You can list a thousand men to agree with your GAP. They can make presentations with colored pictures and a slide show and surround sound. �

And I will tell you that there are a BILLION people who believe those writings I cited at the top of this post to be THEIR "holy" sacred writings � But MY Authority, The Inerrant Holy Bible, says that every one of those Billion persons will rot in Hades for their traditions of Men that reject Jesus.

Bottom Line Jangler: No matter how many vacuous Hegelian, Marxian arguments you try to confuse others with and no matter how many you scrounge up to agree with you; Heresy in Masse is STILL HERESY. Ask a Buddhist or Muslim.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]