Re: News Article: Spruce-up for centre -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 8/03/09 12:19:57pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Re: News Article: Spruce-up for centre
In reply to: Jarvis 's message, "Re: News Article: Spruce-up for centre" on 8/03/09 1:21:34am

>Are the 'Job Centre managers' also in the JA? I like
>the way your local job centre supports a group of
>people who would like to hit children with 'the rod'
>if it wasn't illegal.

Good point. Just goes to show how insidiously the JA has assimilated itself. I bet the Jobcentre folks are completely in the dark about what the JA are really about.....and would be embarrassed if they realised.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

A fan of the clip round the ear ;) -- Tom, 8/03/09 8:00:25pm

Re: A fan of the clip round the ear ;) -- nelly, 8/03/09 9:14:53pm

JA Conservatives -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 1:47:35pm
- Re: JA Conservatives -- Tom, 9/03/09 6:34:02pm
Beating - such a strong word. -- Tom, 9/03/09 6:31:32pm
- Rodding is the JA word -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 8:33:20pm
  - The JA Thesaurus ;) -- Tom, 9/03/09 8:45:54pm
    - rodding is JA vernacular, not biblical -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 8:52:08pm
      - What can I say? -- Tom, 9/03/09 8:59:49pm
        Noel defends what you now deny -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 9:58:53pm
        Hmmmmmm -- Tom, 9/03/09 10:09:54pm
        Re: Hmmmmmm -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 10:17:50pm
        Re: Hmmmmmm -- Tom, 9/03/09 10:19:48pm
        fashions and bannings -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 10:33:35pm
        Re: fashions and bannings -- nelly, 9/03/09 10:52:21pm
        Re: fashions and bannings -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 11:08:50pm
        Name and shame -- Tom, 9/03/09 11:53:17pm
        Re: Name and shame -- nelly, 10/03/09 12:31:30am
        Re: Name and shame -- Peter Eveleigh, 10/03/09 7:17:20pm
        Tabloid headlines are they the new gospel? -- Tom, 9/03/09 11:58:35pm
        red tops sensationalise the unusual, not the commonplace -- Peter Eveleigh, 10/03/09 7:20:27pm
  - Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Barbara, 11/03/09 11:48:06am
    - Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Jarvis, 11/03/09 3:11:05pm
      - UGH! -- Barbara, 12/03/09 12:02:24pm
        Re: UGH! -- Jarvis, 23/03/09 8:13:06am
    - Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Annonymous, 17/03/09 10:03:43am
      - Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- James Dobson, 17/03/09 11:02:35am
        James Dobson -- Barbara, 17/03/09 11:09:50am
        Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Peter Eveleigh, 17/03/09 7:23:37pm
        Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Barbara, 17/03/09 8:20:16pm
        Blooming heck -- Barbara, 17/03/09 8:23:01pm
        God the rodder -- Peter Eveleigh, 17/03/09 9:46:03pm
        Re: God the rodder -- Barbara, 17/03/09 10:22:56pm
      - Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- nelly, 17/03/09 11:27:51pm
        Re: Beating = Rodding = Flogging -- Barbara, 18/03/09 12:19:32am

the difference is that most WOULD not beat but the JA WOULD -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 1:40:26pm

Re: the difference is that most WOULD not beat but the JA WOULD -- Jarvis, 9/03/09 3:27:22pm
- Hmmmmmm -- Tom, 9/03/09 6:38:11pm
- Re: the difference is that most WOULD not beat but the JA WOULD -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 8:24:42pm
  - Re: the difference is that most WOULD not beat but the JA WOULD -- nelly, 9/03/09 8:49:48pm
    - Radicals -- Tom, 9/03/09 9:03:14pm
      - Re: Radicals -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 10:00:29pm
        Re: Radicals -- Tom, 9/03/09 10:10:55pm
        Re: Radicals -- Peter Eveleigh, 9/03/09 11:14:36pm
        Re: Radicals -- Tom, 10/03/09 12:00:26am
        Re: Radicals -- Peter Eveleigh, 10/03/09 7:28:49pm

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>Are the 'Job Centre managers' also in the JA? I like >>the way your local job centre supports a group of >>people who would like to hit children with 'the rod' >>if it wasn't illegal. > >Good point. Just goes to show how insidiously the JA >has assimilated itself. I bet the Jobcentre folks are >completely in the dark about what the JA are really >about.....and would be embarrassed if they realised.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.