VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]
Subject: Re: The WEAC Party


Author:
Ian (Oshkosh, WI)
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:27:28 11/04/02 Mon
In reply to: Jung! 's message, "Re: The WEAC Party" on 06:25:36 11/04/02 Mon
 I agree with you about the after-effects of a strike. It is illegal, and I would not support this strike if it occurred. I doubt that a strike would actually happen, but I could see things getting very ugly. The QEO is unfair, but you can't fight fire with gasoline and put our kids at risk. It's just irresponsible, plain and simple. It should be an interesting couple weeks to come, especially if McCallum should pull an upset...
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: The WEAC PartyDan15:18:53 11/09/02 Sat

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.