For the room on stage and for Bob's limit for administrative purposes for his staff, he says 60 is the limit. SO WHAT if NC had 100!!! 100 contestants in CA would mean at least 6 nights of prelims! Who the hell would ever volunteer to head that up or even want to judge or attend? -- Miss California Unofficial Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Subject: For the room on stage and for Bob's limit for administrative purposes for his staff, he says 60 is the limit. SO WHAT if NC had 100!!! 100 contestants in CA would mean at least 6 nights of prelims! Who the hell would ever volunteer to head that up or even want to judge or attend?
Author: I'm glad Ca thinks more reasonably and keeps 60 as the limit.	[ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ] Date Posted: 19:11:27 07/04/13 Thu In reply to: 60 is nothing. ( only 8 more than Miss America) 's message, "North Carolina used to have 100 girls just in the Miss divison." on 18:40:14 07/04/13 Thu [ Next Thread \| Previous Thread \| Next Message \| Previous Message ]

[> [> [> Subject: Teens would be seperate then. 100 contestants? 4 nights of prelims. Groups of 25. Do-able.
Author: Some people have no imagination. Think small, remain small. [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 19:53:11 07/04/13 Thu [ Post a Reply to This Message ]