VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6] ]
Subject: Well I have several videos from Southwest Video and they are all excellent. I think you're just a sore loser.


Author:
get a clue
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:34:53 07/08/13 Mon
In reply to: Former who has many low quality DVDs in her collection.... 's message, "While I know we have used Southwest video for some time now, I just think his equipment is very far from up to par to produce a high quality video and web stream. You have to use a hi-definition camera in order to view it in hi-def and his equipment is just ancient in terms of what's out there now. The quality of the DVDs is terrible, especially for how much they cost. While the equipment isn't the only issue, it's a good place to start - find a new videographer with updated cameras!" on 16:49:42 07/08/13 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: Wow. Rude and completely uncalled for. I'm far from a sore loser. I had a wonderful experience in this program and competed multiple times at the state level. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinks the videos are less than stellar. Have you watched them on a hi-def TV?


Author:
Former
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 03:57:25 07/09/13 Tue


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: As I said before, this has little to do with the video. If the lighting were better you would have a better video. All one needs to do is compare the webstream to other states. It was piss poor. Don't blame the video company. Blame those who won't spend more money on decent lighting of that stage.


Author:
Do you understand?
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:09:42 07/09/13 Tue


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: I agree. It seems very silly to blame the video company. Shooting a pageant or other event is an easy task. What makes it trying is when the stage lighting is less than ideal. This is the case with the Miss California Pageant. As an ED I know that stage lighting is important. It however is extremely costly. It is NOT the video companies responsibililty to provide lighting. It is always the responsibility of the event organizers.


Author:
An E.D.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:56:53 07/09/13 Tue


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: ,,


Author:
,,
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04:45:14 07/10/13 Wed


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.