Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: Wow. Rude and completely uncalled for. I'm far from a sore loser. I had a wonderful experience in this program and competed multiple times at the state level. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinks the videos are less than stellar. Have you watched them on a hi-def TV? | |
Author: Former | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 03:57:25 07/09/13 Tue In reply to: get a clue 's message, "Well I have several videos from Southwest Video and they are all excellent. I think you're just a sore loser." on 17:34:53 07/08/13 Mon [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> Subject: As I said before, this has little to do with the video. If the lighting were better you would have a better video. All one needs to do is compare the webstream to other states. It was piss poor. Don't blame the video company. Blame those who won't spend more money on decent lighting of that stage. | |
|
Author: Do you understand? [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:09:42 07/09/13 Tue [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> Subject: I agree. It seems very silly to blame the video company. Shooting a pageant or other event is an easy task. What makes it trying is when the stage lighting is less than ideal. This is the case with the Miss California Pageant. As an ED I know that stage lighting is important. It however is extremely costly. It is NOT the video companies responsibililty to provide lighting. It is always the responsibility of the event organizers. | |
|
Author: An E.D. [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 08:56:53 07/09/13 Tue [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: ,, | |
|
Author: ,, [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 04:45:14 07/10/13 Wed [ Post a Reply to This Message ] |