Re: Those lovely IB staff... -- Godawful Fan Fiction

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:28:58
Author: smith
Subject: Re: Those lovely IB staff...
In reply to: Linkshander 's message, "Those lovely IB staff..." on Mon, Apr 12 2004, 9:41:51

>Or do Invision's TOS also ban linking to
>offensive material?

Yes they do. The InvisionFree TOS states: "You may not post, upload, link to, or email any Content that contains ... [p]ornography, nudity, or sexual material of any kind."

Full TOS is here -- http://invisionfree.com/index.php?p=tos .

Rules are rules, and the GAFF board was, technically, breaking them all the time.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

OK, that being the case, we DID break the rules. But I'd love to hear of a messagebopard that never has broken the TOS. More to the point, the forum providers must have issues about sex and sexuality. (NT) (NT) -- Hellfire04, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:33:07
- Kids are on those boards, young ones. They have to protect their asses too from what could happen with all those little kids poking about. Let's not bring those issues here. (NT) -- Snorkle, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:36:19
  - Sorry Snorkle, point taken. I've just never seen any preteen ficcers post to the board. I'll shut up about it now. (NT) -- Hellfire04, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:50:41
    - No problem, they don't have to post on the board to go behind our backs and tell the invision support team about all the NC-17 and necro porn we had linked to. (NT) -- Snorkle, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:54:09
      - Stuff -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:05:13
        Agreed. (NT) -- Hellfire04, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:51:46
    - Just loads of *teens*, many of whom are young enough to create legal issues regarding the more explicit stuff. (NT) -- T.E.O.W., Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:25:11
  - Re: Kids are on those boards, young ones. They have to protect their asses too from what could happen with all those little kids poking about. Let's not bring those issues here. -- Bitchy Queen of Fanfiction, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 10:40:28
    - Legality -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 11:08:06
      - Don't post pics -- Dragoness Eclectic, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 15:00:14
        Re: Don't post pics -- Heywood, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 15:02:34
        Insufficient -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 15:11:12
        Ditto -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 15:03:04
    - Site Agreement -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 11:16:00
      - Addition -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 11:42:00
- Well, we've been speculating... -- Catseye, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:38:54
  - Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- Vampi Digitalwytch, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:41:31
  - I agree -- Non-Sock Puppet, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:47:57
    - Re: I agree -- smith, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:58:00
      - Re: I agree -- Catseye, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:05:28
      - Re: I agree -- Heywood, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:11:02
        Re: I agree -- Snorkle, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:16:30
      - Re: I agree -- Vampi Digitalwytch, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:13:16
      - Re: I agree -- Non-Sock Puppet, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 12:31:59
        Re: I agree -- Bitchy Queen of Fanfiction, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 21:38:37
      - Re: I agree -- Dragoness Eclectic, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 13:17:15
  - Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:11:16
    - Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- Catseye, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:14:10
      - Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:17:27
        Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- Catseye, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:35:47
        Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:51:32
        Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- Catseye, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:54:25
        Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:56:20
        Re: Well, we've been speculating... -- Dragoness Eclectic, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 13:35:22
        Re: Previous Post (free vs. paying) -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 12:24:13
        Addition -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 12:30:59
        Reminds me of the Law & Order conversation me and Snorkle had... -- Catseye, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 12:44:50
        Re: Previous Post (lawsuit against free provider) -- MKIceman, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 13:03:29
Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- Vanessa, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:41:38
- Re: Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:47:30
  - Voyforums staff. -- Hellfire04, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:03:29
- Re: Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- MKIceman, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 10:53:27
- Re: Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- The Site Guru, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:14:16
  - Re: Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- Heywood, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:22:21
    - Re: Is there anything in VOY's TOS that could get us kicked here...? -- The Site Guru, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:31:54
  - Try this site provider...it's the most permissive I've seen... -- silrayn silverwolf, Mon, Apr 12 2004, 11:35:29
    - I think it's only legally child porn if there are pics, not links to bad prose (NT) -- Spiletta42, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 2:37:47
      - okay. ^^ Stores trivia in her head for future use. (NT) -- silrayn silverwolf, Tue, Apr 13 2004, 11:17:01

Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.