VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon April 11, 2005 18:44:38
Author: Ram1
Subject: We need a new AD. No question about it. But what remains a question is what is it going to take for a change to be made. Is there a legitimate chance we are stuck w/ current AD till he retires (yikes!!!) or are their potential catalysts out there that would cause a change sooner? I'd like to think that his record speaks for itself.... I'm curious to see what peoples thoughts are re: the feasibility of a regime change..... This is the real question, not whether or not we need a new AD...
In reply to: ramMan 's message, "Fordham Scoreboard – Week 33" on Sun April 10, 2005 21:56:50


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • I find it interesting that people are screaming about Frank below the most positive set of team records I think I've ever seen on the board. I'm not doubting that we're next-to-last in the Commissioner's standings, but talk about not looking at the silver lining. It never helps your credibility when you hammer someone when the reasons for doing so seem quite apart from the subject at hand. P.S. I'm using a new monicker. I've given up "Drag-less," adopted to celebrate the departure of Hill. (NT) -- Rambow, Mon April 11, 2005 18:57:43
  • Rambone would be a better monicker. Just one man's opinion - maybe I should take that one. (NT) -- J92, Mon April 11, 2005 19:25:56
  • I was responding to the post indicating that we were next to last in the Commissioner's standings, an annual assessment--and not the results of one good week. You remind me of a broker who tried to sell me tech stocks when they went up for one week during the "tech wreck" of 2000-2002. Do you really think a bunch of victories in one week signals the end of four decades of athletic mediocrity under Frank? You can't be serious. (NT) -- Frank Must Go!, Mon April 11, 2005 20:36:38
  • And the whole time I thought it was b/c you stopped wearing dresses. (NT) -- ace93, Mon April 11, 2005 21:25:52
  • Rambow f/k/a Drag-less. you have nailed the problem. Frank survives because no one makes an intelligent case against him. The rantings on this board are frequently so ridiculous, and from the same posters over and over again, that it is easy for Frank to say that his detractors are nuts. (NT) -- WordsofWisdom, Mon April 11, 2005 23:42:36
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.