Create a New Forum Owner Login Contribute & Create Your Member account VoyUser Login (see contribute) VoyForums Directory/Categories No-ads: Completely remove ads from your forum VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News Help Desk VoyForums Exchange FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions Search VoyForums

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

• Who are all you "new" posters here suddenly defending Rambacker??? This is your first time posting on this board, a bit of a coincidence wouldn't you say? Bottom line is most of us know eachother or know some of the other posters here. We all go to the games and occassionally the functions. For some odd reason, the guy that posts the most , by far, is known to nobody, has never identified himself at a function and chooses to remain anonymous. I mean, this is just basketball we are talking about here so hiding like that is a tad strange, but hey, to each his own. Right , wrong or indifferent, that type of MO is going to catch flack. (NT) -- '85, Fri April 22, 2005 11:48:23
  • Why do you all care so much about who Rambacker is? He posts a lot of interesting recruiting information and is a generally very knowledgeable BB guy. Enjoy it all. Or get a life. Whatever. (NT) -- Upstate Ram, Fri April 22, 2005 14:32:30
    • A grown man, posting every single day , alluding to being directly connected to the hoops program, and he is afraid to reveal himself ? Most of the guys here are friends, its a small community. As pointed out its basketball for god sakes, not nuclear secrets. Only a freak or worse, someone who wants to make it seem like he is a coach, fueling wild speculation, would want to hide his true identity. (NT) -- Salmon Rushdie, Fri April 22, 2005 18:13:44
      • I disagree. One of the prerogatives of the Internet (which is why boards like this use handles rather than real names) is that you can protect your privacy if you wish. Personally, I don't care who Rambacker is or isn't. I just look forward to the information he presents here. If he wants to remain anonymous, that's his choice. He doesn't owe it to anybody to say who he is, where he is from, or where he might be going to on business today or tomorrow. I actually think he's having his fun watching some of the people on this board hop all over themselves trying to "unmask" him. I am interested instead in what DW and his staff are doing to build a winner here. That's why I check out this board. (NT) -- Upstate Ram, Fri April 22, 2005 19:46:48
        • Yes and the staff has expressed concern over erroneous and privileged information that he is posting. If it can be harmful to the program then its bad, period. (NT) -- John Q. Public, Sat April 23, 2005 10:03:56
          • Whitte said "%#!$#%!@!@%#!@$ deleted $!$#!@%#! Rambacker %$!#%#!%@" (NT) -- Cartman, Mon April 25, 2005 05:44:19
          • That's a pile of hogwash. I keep close tabs on that, so you are reaching in a desperate way. What's your next name going to be, multiple man? '85, ramfan? (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon April 25, 2005 09:45:13
        • See that is the problem upstate. Its ok for Rambacker to protect his own privacy but liberally comment about the decisions and backgrounds of 17 year old kids, using their real names. That's a huge problem. (NT) -- Ant Hill, Sat April 23, 2005 10:50:04
          • But aren't the people who are criticizing him for doing this also berating him for simply quoting information that is publicly available on recruiting websites? It seems his critics are trying to have it both ways, i.e. he is wrong for a) anonymously reporting "secret information" the staff doesn't want revealed, and b) he is rehashing information that is available to one and all on the Internet. I guess his critics want him to a) reveal who he really is, and b) stop talking? This is ridiculous. (NT) -- Upstate Ram, Sat April 23, 2005 13:32:25
            • No he claims he has his own personal, independent recruiting source. The guy is a tool. (NT) -- RicksASlob, Sat April 23, 2005 17:28:33
            • If the information is available on recruiting sites, then he should cite his sources when he posts the information. Instead, he claims that they come from his personal sources. (NT) -- Ramfan, Sat April 23, 2005 19:33:28
              • ramfan - you come across as bitter, jealous and obsessed with me. If I were you, if you want to achieve any credibility at all, I'd try my best to post valuable and interesting information on this board. So far, that hasn't happened and you come across as a sad figure who is obsessed with an anonymous poster. By the way, it's very transparent that you post here under different "names". (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon April 25, 2005 08:34:45
                • Oh, really? Why don't you obtain the IP addresses and prove it? I'd be happy to give JoDete permission to give out my IP address, if he were willing to settle this. Don't flatter yourself, guy- I really could care less what you do on these boards. If you want to pretend you're the "all-knowing source" for Fordham basketball information by posting every "breaking" news story from a media outlet, by all means, be my guest. But please, don't imply that I would have an obsession with a petty, insecure old man like yourself. I've got better things to do with my time. Again, please check the IP addresses. (NT) -- Ramfan, Mon April 25, 2005 19:31:38
                  • That's not even a good try at keeping your cover. Elementary schools kids know that IP addresses mean nothing on message boards. You merely move between several computers and post on each. The consistent and very recognizable use of weak language gives you away. You are obsessed, and that's obvious just from the posts you make using ramfan. Admit it, it's pathetic. You should move on, you need to get a life. (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon April 25, 2005 20:11:26
        • People that have a problem with Rambacker were probably spanked by him at one time or another, Frank cronies or some bizzare Iona troll. They think if they spew out something annoying everytime he posts that they can shut him up. Not gonna happen. I know ace93 you are busy, but I wish alot of these unprovoked attacks could just be deleted. Easier said then done I know, but they are getting on our collective nerves. (NT) -- Dutch, Sat April 23, 2005 12:14:45
          • Getting on whose collective nerves? You and your 18 aliases? (NT) -- Ramfan, Sat April 23, 2005 19:34:43
            • Interesting that you mention aliases - it's clear who is using them. That would be you. Don't you have something better to do? (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon April 25, 2005 08:36:39
            • I have never posted under a different name than this, although I have posted less this past year. What you don't get is that those of us that are not as close to FU's inner workings and the college hoop scene appreciate, maybe even rely, on RB's updates for our info. You/Slambacker/other multiple name posters contribute nothing. I don't contribute anything either, but I don't sling mud at those that do. Nobody cares about your issues with RB, he adds value and you do not. Case closed. (NT) -- Dutch, Mon April 25, 2005 13:58:25
              • I have no problem with RB's updates. My problem is when he commits copyright infringement, ie. blatantly stealing information from other websites and claiming it as his own. You are entitled to your opinion about me (whether it's informed or otherwise), but know that I am not trying to prevent people on this board from getting information. If you can't understand why I dont approve of copyright infringement, I would urge you to become more familiar with copyright law. (NT) -- Ramfan, Mon April 25, 2005 19:51:17
                • What a load of crap. You got trashed by me and you can't handle it. Deal with the truth, then move on. You're a pathetic follower on a message board. (NT) -- Rambacker, Mon April 25, 2005 20:32:26
  • '85 - When you've posted 1/10 the info that Rambacker has posted here, get back to us. Until then, appreciate all the info he gives us. You're a joke. (NT) -- FC -75, Tue April 26, 2005 11:35:31
    • FC my response was not directed to Rambacker nor did it have anything to do with his recruiting posts. I haven't crticized any of the recruiting posts. The point was in response to the poster calling for deletion of posts. Banning posters for violating rules 1-5 would have applied to Rambacker, Guy F, and a host of others who engaged in a silly name calling feud for many months. Now as to calling someone a joke, I would be more than happy to discuss that with you face to face at the next MJ Armstrong's reception. I sit in section 106, row D seat 2 should you care to discuss your comments in person at a game. I know most of the guys so please be sure to come introduce yourself. (NT) -- '85, Wed April 27, 2005 06:47:01