[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Winning boys? Wasn't William Wilberforce responsible for outlawing that sort of thing? (NT) -- ... trading, 23:30:09 01/26/05 Wed
• Neath (NT) -- Graham, 00:46:57 01/27/05 Thu
• What a silly reply from Graham. Anyone would think he didn't understand the simple question My head says Newport but my heart wants Glamorgan Wanderers to win (NT) -- CK, 07:39:22 01/27/05 Thu
  • The SUBJECT TITLE is "CUP". The question "WHO DO YOU WANT TO WIN?". As I don't want either team listed in the options to win the cup, I put down who I WANT TO WIN THE CUP. Quite simple really. Most people with an IQ larger than their shoe size should have been able to work it out for themselves if they read the heading. Now if he'd asked, "who do you want to win the cup tie between Newport and Glamorgan Wanderers?", that would have been more conducive to your own reply. (NT) -- Graham, 10:59:06 01/27/05 Thu
  • By the way ck, I'm still waiting for a reply from you off the other thread regarding your questioning my working situation, how little you know about my working situation and what it's got to do with you. Feel free to answer on this thread as it isn't a particularly good one. (NT) -- Graham, 11:07:12 01/27/05 Thu
• Graham, you can't have an arguement with someone who thinks their perfect and I know I am above perfection. Love and kisses till next time cos I've got double Maths next. (NT) -- CK, 11:39:18 01/27/05 Thu
  • I strongly suggest that until you are able to hold up your end of an argument and back up your views using reason and facts, you should avoid starting them. You've made yourself look rather silly again. (NT) -- Graham, 17:43:46 01/27/05 Thu
    • To be honest 'fella' i think its you who looks rather silly. The question asked my Insider was not a free answer, it was a multiple choice. He gave you 2 teams and you had to pick one of them. Guess what, Neath wasnt one of them. Im not starting an arguement but i 'strongly suggest' you grow up a little, it was obvious (even to me) what he was asking. (NT) -- Rhys J, 19:54:13 01/27/05 Thu
      • The title was "CUP". The question "WHO DO YOU WANT TO WIN? As neither Newport nor the Wanderers will win it, I say Neath. It should have been worded properly. The title should have said "cup match" or some such thing. Vague statements like that do nobody any good. But as it has nothing to do with Ebbw Vale (rather like your dragon threads), in hindsight, why was it posted here? (NT) -- Graham, 20:51:46 01/27/05 Thu
        • That's a valid point Graham (and by the way I think Neath will win too!) (NT) -- EIA, 21:03:30 01/27/05 Thu
          • League and cup double you reckon? If they win at Carmarthen on Saturday, they'd just as well give them the league title there and then. (NT) -- Graham, 21:32:02 01/27/05 Thu
• You could never be wrong could you Graham??? (NT) -- CK, 07:37:17 01/28/05 Fri
  • That's correct. Whiter than white and always in the right. Never been wrong in my whole life. I'm easy to get along with when people learn how to worship me. (NT) -- Graham, 11:17:14 01/28/05 Fri
• And the saddest thing is you beleive every word you've just written. That is why you are the bigest bigot on this message board. No offence to you personally but the definition is spot on for you. Enjoy the Llandovery game tomorrow with your fellow supporters. Speak soon. (NT) -- CK, 11:31:37 01/28/05 Fri
  • It's true mun!!!! I'm quite shocked that I haven't been made supreme ruler of the universe with total power over life and death yet (still, there's always next year). (NT) -- Graham, 15:56:05 01/28/05 Fri

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• I'll be nice to them *IF* they are decent towards us for a change...Cant see that happening (NT) -- -, 23:12:15 01/27/05 Thu
• I hope you have never shouted abuse at the officials Graham. Reading your postings on here I would assume you are a very gracious supporter who doesn't get upset wnen things don't go the way of his team on the pitch.I agree with you on this point that shouting abuse at a ref is extremely petty and highly childish. Well said Graham. (NT) -- CK, 07:42:08 01/28/05 Fri

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Aye. Why not. Should be a good crack, as long as no money is wagered (NT) -- CJ, 22:27:53 01/27/05 Thu
• Just had a look at their site. A number of good prizes on there too, including a trip to watch the 2005 Lions in New Zeland (apparantly, you get to sit by Wally). (NT) -- Graham, 23:56:39 01/27/05 Thu

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Sorry, I didn't mean to adress it to just Milo, it's open for any of the committee who are involved with the production of the match day program. (NT) -- Graham, 00:54:24 01/27/05 Thu
• Give me a ring or drop a mail to my norm email add and will try to ans (NT) -- Milo, 19:11:28 01/27/05 Thu
  • Answer you even!! Thats trying to post via my mobile for you?!! (NT) -- Milo, 19:20:33 01/27/05 Thu
    • Check your mail Milo, I've just sent a reply. (NT) -- Graham, 21:30:33 01/27/05 Thu
      • Just returned the mail Gra! (NT) -- Milo (on a computer now not his mobile!), 22:48:42 01/27/05 Thu
        • Thanks for the info mate, I've just mailed all the required details to you. (NT) -- Graham, 23:49:41 01/27/05 Thu

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Milo - Pontypool on Wednesday. The Hanbury is about the nearest place to the ground for a pint. Just up from the Leisure Centre carpark. The leisure centre is closed, so no chance of a pint at the leisure centre bar (NT) -- Wally, 23:09:03 01/27/05 Thu

[ Edit | View ]

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• They lost in the preliminary round to Newport Saracens by 43 - 15 back in August. (NT) -- Graham, 22:35:02 01/25/05 Tue

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Yep, I'll be there. got mine book on Tuesday. Lots of telephone buttons to select.. (NT) -- Wally, 17:29:42 01/22/05 Sat
• Ian, It's A Sell Out! (NT) -- Wally, 22:32:46 01/24/05 Mon
  • Right...I got a couple of extras, over to Ebay! (NT) -- Ian, 21:06:57 01/25/05 Tue
• Christ! £49.50 for half a band! (NT) -- Eye Jay, 17:20:59 01/25/05 Tue
• Probably would av been cheaper if dear ole Freddy was still around ! (NT) -- Powis, 20:01:33 01/25/05 Tue

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Nope, he wasn't in the squad. (NT) -- Graham, 01:29:28 01/24/05 Mon
• Jog On?? WTF is that all about?????? (NT) -- Insiders insider........, 15:25:53 01/25/05 Tue

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Fair enough, wasn't wanderings fault we got booted out so good luck to them. (NT) -- -, 19:47:08 01/22/05 Sat
  • Wanderers even (NT) -- i give up, 19:48:19 01/22/05 Sat
• It would be interesting to know who exactly is on the WRU Disciplinary Committee, and to which clubs they are affiliated. (NT) -- SaD, 23:09:50 01/22/05 Sat
• We may have got away with the permit thing, but then we wouldn't have learned our lesson. We must do things properly! (NT) -- AD, 12:02:39 01/23/05 Sun
  • I wonder how many other clubs are in the same position as Ebbw, but no-one 'complained'? (NT) -- SaD, 13:35:37 01/23/05 Sun
    • Apparantly it's fairly common practice for two clubs to sort out the paperwork afterwards. (NT) -- Graham, 15:19:02 01/23/05 Sun
      • Common or not we still cant complain as paperwork should be sorted out. We should have learnt by now we cant trust anyone in rugby so you have to be totally up front with paperwork (NT) -- -, 16:05:23 01/23/05 Sun
        • Can't argue with that. (NT) -- Graham, 21:57:58 01/23/05 Sun
          • No-one can argue if the rules are being applied fairly across the board, but can you put your hand on your heart and honestly say that this is what is happening? (NT) -- SaD, 23:45:24 01/23/05 Sun
            • Fact remains that if we'd followed the rules properly they'd have had no grounds for kicking us out. (NT) -- -, 00:42:51 01/24/05 Mon
              • But isn't that the point. It appears to me that our coaches DID think they were following correct procedure. (NT) -- SaD, 09:51:45 01/24/05 Mon
                • No disrespect intended here, but: how it appears to you is irrelevant, what the coaches were thinking is irrelevant and they were NOT following the corrext procedure. End of conspiracy theory. (NT) -- html junkie, 12:00:34 01/24/05 Mon
                  • No disrespect intended here either, but I thought this was a messageboard, intended for intellegent rugby debate, not Blaenau Gwent/s answer to the Stepford Wifes. (NT) -- SaD, 15:44:23 01/24/05 Mon
                    • That should be 'Wives' of course. Joking apart, I hate double-standards and favoritism. Where is that mythical level playing field? (NT) -- SaD, 15:50:27 01/24/05 Mon
                      • Stradey Park?? (NT) -- Nick, 16:00:02 01/24/05 Mon
                      • I cant see the issue here, we broke the rules and were punished. Other clubs are irrelevent - we lose any right to complain and have to learn from it (NT) -- -, 20:41:01 01/24/05 Mon

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• Cheers. Isn't District A Gwent? If so, and if all the other districts 'ganged up' on us, we wouldn't have a chance. I'm not suggesting that this has happened, of course, but it is interesting to note that the vast majority of Premiership clubs punished this year are from Gwent! (NT) -- SaD, 23:42:11 01/23/05 Sun
• Re: WRU disciplinary committee (Regulatory committee) -- SIMON, 12:49:48 01/24/05 Mon

[ Edit | View ]

Replies:

• If it is, what about the paper work? -- SaD, 13:44:16 01/22/05 Sat
• He's gone. Official website confirms it! Obviously doesn't fancy his chances with Maclauhlin back at EXP. Pity - he's a nice player. (NT) -- html junkie, 13:56:58 01/23/05 Sun
  • So it's a straight swap then, Macca for Danno? (NT) -- Graham, 15:20:04 01/23/05 Sun