Thanks Katie, -- DietLowCarb.com

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:59:00 06/03/02 Mon
Author: Sherry
Subject: Thanks Katie,
In reply to: Katie 's message, "Another calories needed to maintain site" on 10:19:43 06/03/02 Mon

I like those figures better. The other one seemed a bit high. This one still has me eating over 2100 calories a day, but at least I don't have to aim for 2700 which seemed close to impossible.

I found that when I was close to 2100 for those few days last month, I was losing, I never did come close to 2700 calories.

It would be interesting to find out what the cutting off point is. What the low point is where you can't lose, and where the high point is where you can't lose. And what the range is where you can.

Anyway thanks for finding this site, this makes a little more sense. I really think that other site was meant for body builders anyway.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I did this one time each at the two lowest activity levels and came up with a range of 1900-2200 to lose. Big, big difference from the 2500-2900 range that I got with the other calculation. (NT) -- Katie, 12:32:14 06/04/02 Tue