Re: Criticize a Judge ( Or Anyone Else) Go to Jail? -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Criticize a Judge ( Or Anyone Else) Go to Jail?

Author:
Wouldn't get too excited about this...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:00:44 03/01/13 Fri
In reply to: Eric Deters Facebook Post 's message, "Re: Criticize a Judge ( Or Anyone Else) Go to Jail?" on 08:36:02 03/01/13 Fri

As much as I would love to see someone come in and clean this up, the Bulldog isn't the sharpest tool in the box. He's nothing more than a self-promoting carnival barker who's lucky to still have his KY license after this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/58639959/Eric-Deters-Order-finding-Rule-11-violations

"At its most basic premise, Rule 11 counsels attorneys to think before they act. Rule 11 requires that attorneys conduct a basic inquiry into the facts and law underlying a case before demanding the resources of other parties and the Court in resolving a dispute. In this case, Eric Deters failed to comply with this simple rule. Instead, he filed a complaint without either conducting or appropriately reviewing the basic research necessary to ensure the credibility of the claims he sought to advance. Deters� deficiencies in research resulted in him making statements in pleadings that were blatantly incorrect and contrary to all precedent on particular subjects. Thus, the Court concludes that Deters has violated Rule 11. As a result, he will be sanctioned."

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]