VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Dearborn County Public Forum
This Forum is provided as a service to the citizens of Dearborn County. Its purpose is to provide a place to discuss and debate issues that affect us all. For moderated reporting on current issues that you may see posted here please visit the related blog.

Dearborn County IN - Public Forum at Blogspot
Subject: Open letter to YoY, Sing, Lee, and the less-than-sincerely confused, but mostly YoY


Author:
Higgins
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 02:30:00 10/10/11 Mon
This was not a matter of weighing two equally balanced rights (being abusive), nor any concern for the prevention of public harm (shouting "FIRE!") or the preservation of public order (inciting violence). Any of these things might have been subject to sanction and outside the protection of the 1st Amendment. This was, instead, clearly an attempt to bring to the court of public opinion grievance against a public servant, and as such immune (or should have been) to criminal charge. If you are such a learned scholar in the ways of the Law, this should be plain even to you.


If you are so well educated in the law (an assertion I am somewhat skeptical of) you should know that it is beyond REASONABLE doubt, not "shadow". Every indication is there was very little reason exhibited by either the prosecution or the jury. In reality, nothing was proven. I have yet to see a single cite from Dan's writings that, in proper context, can be taken as a threat by any objective person (my challenge to you, Sing, remains unanswered). The only thing proved is that when one side does all the talking they are able to herd ignorant sheep into doing whatever they wish for them to do. You might just as easily have "proven" him to be a witch and had the jury clamoring for him to be burned at the stake, it's happened before. (Remember Salem?) The Inquisitors found it to be highly convenient and lucrative to do so whenever they found a rich jew, or a woman with property, or indeed anybody that dared oppose them.


I find it rather comical that you now suggest that he should have bolted from the so called "protection" of his learned council to defend himself. Especially as it is usually the case that those taking your position cannot wait to call him a fool for representing himself. Do you really think he had any say in the matter, given that he had no prior consultation with his attorney? In truth, not speaking may have been his only option, given that the prosecution (or should I say their representatives? - its rather hard to tell - Sheriff runs the jail, Prosecutor runs a big chunk of the Sheriff's personnel in the form of the SCU, SCU sits as Commisioner... it's all so... incestuous) has been tampering with his medication for the last six months. I know I would not be inclined to try to provide any testimony having been drugged by my inquisitors.


No, you can pretend, if you wish, that this is an example of the Courts functioning as a well oiled machine of justice, but there was no justice meted out here. You can pretend, if you wish that he got a fair shake, but this wasn't about fairness. Fairness would have seen him bailed out at a reasonable level to permit him to participate in his own defense, not railroaded with lies that should have been easily disproved. Fairness would have seen him recieving the medication required to allow him to be effective in that defense, not drugged by a quack with no background in the matter reading from the PDR. No, this wasn't a fair fight, not even close. In this little piece of theater, this was a prisoner living in a hole in the ground, locked away from the sun, starved and abused, sick with malaria, being dragged to the prison square to be beaten bloody by the fit, well fed, sadistic monster in charge of the prison because he made too much noise in his hole. There was no reason here, no justice, and certainly no fairness, And Truth, well, any consideration for the truth checked out and left town a long time ago.

We do have one point of agreement, however. "Just because you can do something does not mean you should." A pity you weren't there to whisper this in Caesar's ear before he decided to crucify the First Amendment.

Replies:
Subject: Dan,


Author:
Fed up (0u812)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 23:49:26 10/17/11 Mon
Dan, you can file a complaint against Fed. Attn. at OFFICE FOR PROFFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, at the justice dept. will send you the info. This is sure going to effect Mitch if he decides to run again, I remember when he use to run for coffee. HEHE They are sure bold about keeping the Supreme court guys in the family! Its not always what you know, but what you know about that person! Sometimes you have to be as heartless as the lawyers. It took 2 lawyers 3days to write Indiana criminal law! I believe in the 1950s Its about to be rewriten. Alot of law students about to make a hit on your site.
Subject: new shelter opening only so so


Author:
higher hopes (not impressed)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 22:57:02 10/17/11 Mon
I went to the grand opening of the new animal shelter. I was impressed with the building itself . The woman who I talked to showed me how it was built to be community friendly and it was geothermal to cut the monthly budget and help the environment. I signed up to come in once a month to help walk the dogs. They seemed so organized they even have classes to take before you volunteer. I hope it works out for them it seems like alot for a grassroots organization to take on. They have so many animals I just don't know how they will get them all adopted. Also I wonder why none of the news channels showed up there was like hundreds of people there? Also why did they have it in a wendsday and not on like a Saturday or a Sunday. I bet they would do better if they planned stuff on weekends. My husband could not come because by the time he got out of work he was dead tired. So I guess really I give them a mixed review after all. Nice people ,good hearts ,good volunteer organization skills. Bad on event planning. The building is very community friendly but putting the event on a wendsday? Nobody gets married on a Monday morning so why do your grand opening on a wendsday. They should of done it as a all weekend event so the news people would come.
Replies:
Subject: Many Thanks to the TRUE Defenders of Our First Amendment Rights


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 12:33:26 10/16/11 Sun
A Post from Dan
Replies:
Subject: Negangard's Vindictiveness


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 09:34:56 10/10/11 Mon
Negangard's last piece of "evidence" was from September 2010. The Humphreys felt this manufactured "fear" in August of '09. Maybe the grand jury was convened (not until February 28th, 2011) because Dan wrote, on Negangard's facebook page on February 7th 2011, asking Negangard who Negangard had to know to make a complaint against him go away. A few days later, Dan got a letter from the Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court informing Dan that his complaint had been dismissed. A few days after that, Dan was notified that he was a target of a grand jury investigation. It took Negangard over five months to get this "dangerous" person off the streets; a person who needed a $600,000 bond in order to "protect" the public; A person who openly criticized the prosecutor for not investigating an unlicensed psychologist who perjured himself in court. Any rational person can see the vindictive/criminal behavior of the Dearborn County Prosecutor's Office.
Replies:
Subject: Communism in Dearborn Co. courthouse


Author:
Kojac (Disturbed)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 18:12:10 10/13/11 Thu
After looking at Dan`s story and looking at court records! I would like to say that my grandfather,father both fought in numerous country`s for our freedom our constitution gives us. It is my understanding they shot and blew up many people of the communist party, and were rewarded with medals from the USA,dont try to take this out of context, im not saying we should kill people in this country, that is not our policy against citizens, but imprisonment is required when people force communism to our citizens!!Men and women are putting theyre lives on the line right this very moment for the freedoms of men and women, children, so they can join in the freedoms on which our flag stands for! If you dont want your name in the public eye dont run for public office! Get a private practice! (LLC)People have gotten on TV and said our PRESIDENT was like Hitler,was MUSLIM,he was COMMUNIST, but they are not in prison because we have a first amendment rite to express our feelings! In order to hold the conviction of Dan the suprem court would half to arrest 3/4 ths. of the population. You being the authority that is in control knows that and probably really dont care because their are laws that protect you from liable responsibility! The wall street guys thought the same thing and look who is knocking on theyre door, the AMERICAN PEOPLE!! ( LAW IS REASON FREE OF PASSION)ARISTODLE !!! And for you people who dont agree with me, that is your rite given to you by the UNITED STATES OF ANERICA ,I KNOW HOW TO WRITE A HABEUS CORPUS!!Arrest me for saying that communism is present in DEARBORN CO. Blackmailing someone to stop writing public information can be considerd a FELONY,FEDERAL CRIMES,People who commit felonys can be arrested by a citizen and subdued in any way nessesary to hold them for proper authoritys! If Dan were truly crazy as the officials say, their would be a whole different story! Now that the story has made the Indiana law blog this story will travel fast!! Kick theyre ask Dan!!
Replies:
Subject: Inadequate defense?


Author:
Maxine
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 09:46:04 10/15/11 Sat
Look at the bull$%&* that happened in this Brewington case.
The minute the public defender posted no witnesses it was obvious he was ignorant of his opponent's tactics.
Adequate defense should have read the entire file and consulted with the client in advance.
Adequate defense would have taken the "protect the judge" gloves off and exposed the vindictive factors in this case. And allowing the prosecutor to determine the focus of the arguments was negligence.
Let's not forget the sheriff and underlings undermining the client's ability to contribute to his defense by restricting his access to his medications as prescribed by his personal physician. Yeah this is bullsh^%*& IMHO
Replies:
Subject: Miscoduct


Author:
Kojac (Investigative)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 20:48:03 10/13/11 Thu
After doing a little research, I have found that former Judge Michael G. Witte former Dearborn Co. Judge now is the Indiana Disaplinary Commision Executive Secratary, for you who dont know what that is! He sits on a 9 member commission that ensures that the Indiana Bar upholds the Rules of Conduct. He leads the group who investigates and prosecutes cases of attorney misconduct!!When was Dan`s complaint thrown out against what appears to be a teed off prosecutor!! I bet they have all eat lunch together, no not bet, might get arressted and put under $100,000.00 bond!On average a class D felony bond in Indiana is $5,000.00 so Dans bond was est.120 times higher for the average Joe,attempted murder doesnt require a $600,000.00 bond.Stranglation is $50,000 in a domestic case!!Unbeleivable and whithout any direct threats!!
Replies:
Subject: More special crimes for Dearborn county


Author:
Happy
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 14:24:08 10/12/11 Wed
Notice it took the State police to get this charged. 2 Felony charges and its a book and release. Same old shit. Now lets slap his hand.
Replies:
Subject: Wrongfully convicted


Author:
Kojac (Just thrilled)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 12:15:47 10/15/11 Sat
If you want to see free spech go to, americaswrongfullyconvicted.com
Subject: Negangard has been wrong before


Author:
Hoosier Pioneer
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 17:10:21 10/10/11 Mon

Anybody remember this? In Deaborn County you can end up in prison if there's an electrical fire in your house.

http://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?S=8223291&nav=menu188_7&config=H264
Replies:
Subject: Negangard Attempts to Criminalize Gun Ownership


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 17:39:49 10/11/11 Tue
A Post Concerning Gun Ownership from Dan
Replies:
Subject: DO YOU KNOW DAN BREWINGTON ON A PERSONAL LEVEL?


Author:
El Krauft (Upset)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 18:42:19 10/12/11 Wed
Do you know Dan Brewington on a personal level? How about his ex? Then BACK OFF! People that are bashing her w/o knowing her, or the entire story, only knowing what Dan wants you to read/know, then BACK OFF!
I know her 1st hand and I can tell you this has been a nightmare for her and her whole family. Probably for Dan's as well! Do you think anyone wants to be a single parent, raising kids without support? Yes divorce is terrible, but it happens and people move on. Do you think the people on the jury were all wrong because they didn't side with Dan? When is he going to face up to the fact that he needs help, so he can move on with his life, and be part of the girls lives? Who has he helped with all the ranting? Has he helped his girls or anyone else? Would he have been better helping his girls by doing what the court ordered? Wouldn't you do whatever it took to be part of your children's lives? Please, if you do not have 1st hand knowledge of what is going on PLEASE don't respond to this, or his rantings, you are only giving him food to feed off of! The jury has spoken. They heard the case, did you? They had to make a decision and I am sure it was not easy for them, but they did what they were expected to do - find him guilty or not and they said guilty. At some point Dan is going to have to realize that he is not always right - sometimes he is in the wrong and this time 12 people said - enough - you are wrong and you have to pay. Who benefits from him being found quilty? Not Dan, not his children, not his family, not his ex. Knowone!! He could have listened to the court, did what they ordered, yes rant to people, but harass and rant and never let up?? It gets old Dan people can only take so much. Time for you to pay the piper. TIME FOR DAN TO MOVE ON SO AT SOME POINT HE GETS THE HELP HE NEEDS SO MAYBE HE CAN BE A PART OF HIS DAUGHTERS LIVES! WASN'T IT ALL ABOUT THEM? ALWAYS? OR WAS IT MORE ABOUT HIM TRYING TO BE IN CONTROL AGAIN?
Replies:
Subject: Cops, Winkees and Woodys on the net.


Author:
Pleaseatleastweararubberglove
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 18:40:45 10/13/11 Thu
Am I the only one in the County who, when I get pulled over by a local cop and he/she asks for my license and registration, I demand to examine his/her computer's hard drive first?
Subject: Election Time


Author:
Surprised
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:45:29 09/30/11 Fri
Here is it getting close to election time and no one on this blog is expressing their opinions. Come on Lawrenceburg people, what about the mayor race. Lawrenceburg City Council is another big race.

Who out there has some opinions on the elections this year?
Replies:
Subject: The SCU at it's best


Author:
Get Real
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:57:38 10/11/11 Tue
So has anyone read the story about Williams Gajdik?

"Gajdik, 38, was arrested last Tuesday evening in Fergus Falls, Minnesota after Dearborn County Special Crimes Unit detectives tracked his movement using pawn shop data. The detectives contacted local police there found Gajdik staying in a motel where he had checked in using his real name."

Okay...this smart guy used his ID to steal a car. Then used his real name while staying in hotels and at pawn shops and it took them a month to catch him. That isn't something I would brag about! Maybe I am wrong, but when someone isn't really hiding, a month to find them is a long time! Apparently they don't watch The First 48 hours in Dearborn County it is The First 30 days....
Subject: Real Fear


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 18:40:14 10/10/11 Mon
A post from Dan
Replies:
Subject: Can Brewington see his kids?


Author:
clarifying with court document
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:31:56 10/10/11 Mon
Can he see his kids? See page 14 of the appeal.
Heck- read it all.
Note also- behavior AFTER the trial was included in the appeal by the district court. How does that work?

http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/07201011.pdf
Replies:
Subject: On the take in Greendale


Author:
Dopey (I think I need to go puke)
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:57:07 10/06/11 Thu
Can someone shed some light on the the current Mayor and city attorney of Greendale not paying several thousand dollars of property taxes? How does one not pay property taxes and then be eligible to receive grant money into the hundreds of thousands of dollars? At the very least it seems completely improper to be a sitting mayor and to try to pull this off for his personal gain. So your telling me the city is worried about losing $30,000 or so due to bad debt with unpaid utility bills so they raise the deposit to a staggering $450.00 to turn the electric on. However it is no problem to give grants into the hundreds of thousands of dollars to the mayor and the city attorney. Can someone explain this to me am I misinformed?
Replies:
Subject: Aurora City Council Member


Author:
justathought
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 19:14:34 10/06/11 Thu
Why is it that once again a Aurora City Council member, Brett Fehrman, has not yet to be arrested? Is it because he is a elected official and they hope to sweep it under the rug? On Sunday Brett battered his wife in front of his child and then took off with his child. The Dearborn County Sheriffs Dept was called out to the Fehrman home,due to the fact he does not even reside with in the city limits,to take the report. Brett took his child to a family members home on Lower Dillsboro Road and dropped her off, but the Sherrifs Dept never caught up with him. So I hear charges are pending and hopefully Aaron Negangard will due the right thing and move forward with the charges, we will see. It's such ashame that it depends on who you are or who you know determines what you can or cannot get away with. Any other wife beater would of already been arrested and in front of a judge.
Replies:
Subject: How is any of this helping kids?


Author:
sincerely confused
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:47:28 10/09/11 Sun
I am sincerely confused. I have been looking over this forum and have noticed many posts regarding "Guilty". In looking over the posts, links etc. my question is how is any of this helping this man to be reunited with his children? It appears that the "cause" is not being focused upon. Seems like a ton of taxpayers money, as well as too many people's time, has been wasted...none of which will benifit the any children - especially his daughters.
Replies:
Subject: "Just because you can it does not mean you should"


Author:
XXX
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 07:17:45 10/10/11 Mon
Here are some real examples of what our 1st amendment allows.

-The female politician who use "crosshairs" and hate speak to "highlight' the strength of her campaign". Did anyone take her to court? No. Freedom of expression.
-The hateful jokes and questionable comments exchanged daily about every Commander and Chief we elect is tolerated. Is this disrespectful and even threatening? I think so.
-"Hillary Clinton is a lesbian", is this a true statement? Have you slept with her? Govt. does not go after those who make these comments. Is it criminal to say this, or should it be a civil matter?
-Even children of political figures and wives are called ugly and ridiculed, and whereabouts publicly disclosed, but you don't see our govt. going after people.
-Protests of war, protests of abortion, criticism of anything or everything.
We are allowed the right to express our opinions-even if it tweaks the ego of those in high places.
Dearborn County has shown no tolerance for criticism of the system, constructive or otherwise. They have spent countless amounts of time and money of taxpayers to shut this man up and discourage/frighten others. It has drawn a lot of attention to them, more than it has the person who appears to be suffering from a radical life changing experience in the courts and the jail. It certainly appears as if they need to be looked at right alongside their scrutiny and sentencing of Dan.
Replies:
Subject: We do this because we can


Author:
Does it matter who says it?
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:20:07 10/10/11 Mon
"We do this because we can" is a good motto for the County. But should they?
The Prosecution did an amazing job. It was a slam dunk, as would be expected with 2 years to prepare.
I wanted to hear proof of allegations, like the drive by threat. Was it untrue? Did they just throw out this allegation naming this man, which now appears to be untrue? Is the person who made this allegation protected?
Don't underestimate the intelligence and abilities of our Prosecutors and authorities. I am convinced that if they felt like it, they could find almost any problematic citizen guilty of some law on the books and make it stick, and even convince a jury.
I find it disturbing and wrong to be this intrusive and controlling of what citizens want to say.
In their defense they have a heightened "spider sense" to protect themselves against those who might actually do harm physically. In this sense they could be viewed as paranoid, so be careful and balance your words and name slinging.
The internet is fairly new, many have not been taught the rules of the game the way those in the public eye might be.
Subject: Dan's Recap


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 13:11:59 10/09/11 Sun
Recap of my Criminal Trial. October 8, 2011
Replies:
Subject: GUILTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Author:
Ralph
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 15:37:25 10/06/11 Thu
Brewington guilty on five of six counts!!
Replies:
Subject: Aurora Elementary School New Discipline Policy


Author:
Anonymous#2
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:36:41 10/07/11 Fri
I would like to hear opinions from parents of children at the Aurora Elementary School on the new discipline policy implemented thisyear. Also, anyone else familiar with this policy please share your opinion as well. Thank you.
Subject: Brewington Sentencing date


Author:
cbm
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 22:01:38 10/06/11 Thu
Dan Brewington was found Guilty of 3 charges of intimidation, 1 of obstruction of justice, and 1 of perjury. He was acquited of release of grand jury information. The jury- 5 women and one man- had lunch brought in and deliberated for about 2 hours. Brewington is now held without bond until his sentencing hearing set for 1 PM on October 24.There was some talk of a presentencing hearing as well, but no date set for that at this time.
Subject: Brewington Trial goes to Day 3 Wednesday


Author:
cbm
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 17:34:33 10/04/11 Tue
Trial resumed today at 8:30 Am- Dr Edward Connor, his wife Sara Connor, Judge Humphrey, Heidi Humphrey, and Anne Jordan all were witnesses today. Court resumes at 8:30 AM Wednesday. Two witnesses left for the state are Melissa Brewington, and Sheriff Kreinhop.The defense is not adding any witnesses other than perhaps the defendant himself.
Replies:
Subject: Brewington Trial goes to Day 4 Thursday


Author:
cbm
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:29:02 10/05/11 Wed
Two witnesses covered today were Melissa Brewington and Sheriff Mike Kreinhop. Jury is looking over documents and Dan Brewington is NOT going to testify.
Trial resumes at 8:30 AM for attorneys to go over final instructions and 9:30 for the jury to come and hear closing statements etc. Then they deliberate.
Brewington has worn his suit all 3 days so far. His attorney texted family over the weekend to bring it.
Lawyers are dropping by to watch at times as are several county activists and friends and family of Dan Brewington.
Replies:
Subject: Dan's Trial


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 20:35:01 10/03/11 Mon
Jury selection was completed, opening statements were made, and one witness was called. Trial resumes at 8:30 tomorrow morning. Thanks to everyone for their thoughts and support.
Subject: Brewington Trial to resume 8:30 AM Tuesday


Author:
cbm
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 20:33:16 10/03/11 Mon
Brewington's trial started at 9 am today- Monday. Jury selection of 6 jurors and alternate finished at 1:30. One hour lunch was followed by opening remarks and the first witness- Angela Loechel, Melissa Brewington's divorce attorney. Court recessed at 4:50 PM and will resume at 8:30 AM tomorrow (Tuesday) Judge Hill expects a total of 3 days to complete the trial.
For any public wanting to observe- it's in the large courtroom on the 2nd floor. Bring something to cushion the benches if you plan to stay a while.:-)
Subject: BREWINGTON TRIAL OCT 3 at 9 AM


Author:
cbm
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 18:37:57 10/02/11 Sun
The Brewington trial begins Monday Oct 3 at 9 AM with jury selection. The jury will only be identified by numbers per the pre-trial motions granted.
They have called 80 jurors and will select from 40 in the morning and go to teh afternoon with more- only if needed, per the judge's instructions at the pre trial hearing.
Replies:
Subject: Election


Author:
Dearborn County Resident
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 15:38:43 10/01/11 Sat
There will be a candidate running for Sheriff next time that will win hands down. He is very well known in Dearborn County and has no police experience but like one of the former sheriff's John Swales, he will win. He does not take crap from anyone and cares about dearborn county and its future. He is already gaining a huge following and wait til you hear him speak. He tells it like it is!
Replies:
Subject: Cowards, Incompetents, and Despots of Dearborn County


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:09:35 09/27/11 Tue
Outside Observer and Guest Blogger Questions Dearborn County Justice
Replies:
Subject: More Outrage


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 20:58:57 09/29/11 Thu
Well over $20,000 of taxpayer money wasted so far.

Another post from Dan

How fix a Grand Jury like Dearborn County Officials
Replies:
Subject: County Orange and Pink Handcuffs it is, I guess


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:25:00 09/28/11 Wed
Am I going to be allowed to wear a suit and tie to court? - Dan 9/27/11
Subject: Still Unbelievable


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:06:00 09/28/11 Wed
Apparently Dan is dangerous and should be a convicted felon because... they said so... Dan's Post 9/27/11
Subject: Does anyone know this man?


Author:
out of towner
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 19:15:17 09/27/11 Tue
Hi all,
I'm from out-of-state and am looking to contact a local man. Unfortunatelly, all I know about him is that his first name is Jake, he is an avid golfer, a recent guest of DCLEC and has a healthy interest in spirits of the liquid variety.
Clearly, this is like looking for the proverbial needle in the stack, but wanted to give it a shot.
By the way, I have enjoyed following your blog very much but I gotta say, Lawrenceburg makes L.A. seem dull!
Replies:
Subject: Address searches through tax records


Author:
Did you know?
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 20:03:06 09/26/11 Mon
I was mad and I wanted to want to write a letter to Commissioners. I stamped them and asked that letters be mailed by county personnel as I was not privy to unlisted addresses. I was told to look up addresses myself through public county tax records. I did this reluctantly. If it could be construed as intimidating, why do county employees suggest using tax records?
Replies:
Subject: Jaw Dropping Update!


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 12:02:57 09/23/11 Fri
A MUST READ!!!

The Smoking Gun That Proves Prosecutor Negangard’s Criminal Activity! 9/23/11
Replies:
Subject: The Schools


Author:
Jilly
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 01:43:16 09/24/11 Sat
In addition to the corrupt politicians, there is the Lawrenceburg School District. I knew a family whose daughter had a middle school 6th grade science teacher who would take another student's homework in homeroom and give it to his daughter to copy. This happened on a regular basis. Then there's the Athletic Director. Many parents voiced serious concerns about him but then commented that they didn't want to make waves because they had younger children coming up who wanted to play sports. Very sad indeed.And the cycle goes on and on in that place. Great role models.
Subject: Judge Sally Blankenship


Author:
in good conscience
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 10:05:55 09/10/11 Sat
From Brewington Timeline Part 2 -The court concurs with Judge Sally Blankenship’s Bond. If she knew about the “alleged” drive by she didn’t mention it.

Probably because the drive-by allegation is an end run by Negangard trying to bolster the high bond he asked for and received from Judge Sally Blankenship. How do these people sleep at night? Do they even have a conscience?
Replies:
Subject: Medical Policy Update


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 13:52:21 09/22/11 Thu
Medical Policy Update at the DCLEC
Replies:
Subject: A Personal Thought from Dan


Author:
Matt Brewington
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 13:11:15 09/21/11 Wed
A Personal Thought from Dan
Replies:
Subject: Crazy Conspiracy Theory?


Author:
Raylan
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 16:37:56 09/21/11 Wed
Fact: Watson is appointed, doesn't consult with his client (much).
Fact: Kelly was being accepted as second seat "pro hac vice" by Watson.
Fact: Watson withdraws because of nascent threat to other clients purported to be appearing before Humphrey.
Fact: Barrett is appointed, doesn't consult with his client. Also doesn't permit participation by Kelly.


The assertion has been made by some that Dan keeps running off his lawyers, but here's the problem. Watson had Kelly to do client management if he needed it. He didn't say he was withdrawing because of differences/conflict with his client. The reason he gives is threat to other clients. Am I wrong to suspect that it may have been threats to his own career, because...


Barrett gets appointed and won't let Kelly into the fray. Would it be beyond reason to suspect that the cause is that he has been pressured NOT to allow that to happen again. Would it be beyond reason to suspect that letting Kelly into the mix and the possibility that Dan might actually get representation is THE reason Watson had to go to save himself? Could it be that Barrett was read-in in advance with direction NOT to allow Kelly to participate "pro hac vice".


Could it be - beyond the obvious dirty tricks with meds, access at the jail, orange jumpers and pink cuffs, outrageous demand for juror identity "protection", pushing the limit of untried detention and then rushing to trial - Could it be that Negangard and his accomplices have actually tampered directly with Dan's defense, though intimidation in the first case and direct corruption in the second?


Why else would Barrett bar Kelly when the benefits are manifestly obvious? Why lose all that extra legwork? Why lose someone to whom you could delegate client management if Dan is so difficult to deal with?


The new (for me) information about Kelly's "pro hac vice" offer, linked with Barrett's pliant acceptance of the juror anonymity motion leads me to believe the fix is in. Is Barrett corrupt and playing for the other side? Or is this just incompetence that makes it LOOK like he is playing for the other team?

Replies:
Subject: Tanners creek shutdown


Author:
Mike C of Manchester
[ Edit | View ]
Date Posted: 17:12:23 09/21/11 Wed
shutdown of Tanners Creek coal fired generators 1, 2, and 3 located in Lawrenceburg by December 31, 2014.

We must actively pursue all reasonable measures to provide for our state’s energy demands in a way that minimizes contaminants in the air we breathe and the water we drink. I also believe, however, that proper planning is required as we pursue “clean” energy production.
The Tanner’s Creek facility in Lawrenceburg generates approximately 1,000 MW of energy production per year. If we were to lose 498 MW of energy production per year, Indiana would experience rolling “brown outs” (i.e., a temporary interruption of power service in which the electric power is reduced, causing lights to flicker and dim and causing problems with electrical appliances and devices, such as computers) during peak usage, which occurred most recently this past July. Immediately closing the Tanner’s Creek facility without another viable and readily available energy production facility would leave Hoosiers with an insufficient supply of energy. A clear plan to replace the coal-fired plants will take time. Tanners Creek 1, 2, and 3 are set to be retired by 2019. It will take several years to build natural gas replacements.
Additionally, we must carefully balance the direct and indirect effects associated with modifying and replacing our current energy production system. For instance, if we were to raise electric rates by 30%, those Hoosiers living on a fixed income may well have to chose between electricity, heat, food, and medicine when deciding how to spend their limited resources. I believe that through proper planning and growth, we can begin modifying and replacing our current energy production system with one based more upon clean energy methodologies without causing financial and health-related burdens on those who are least able to pay for higher electric rates.
The Indiana Legislature has begun pursuing cleaner and more efficient sources of energy production. Senate Enrolled Act 251, for example, was passed during the 2011 session and provides incentives to energy producers to obtain cleaner energy. Specifically, SEA 251 requires the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to adopt rules to establish the voluntary clean energy portfolio standard program to provide incentives to electricity suppliers to obtain specified percentages of electricity from clean energy sources.

Randy Frye
State Representative
Indiana House District 67
[ Main index ] [ Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Thank you for your thoughtful and courteous contributions
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.