Re: INTIMIDATION OR NOT -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: INTIMIDATION OR NOT

Author:
Dear Wait

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:16:41 01/07/13 Mon
In reply to: Wait 's message, "Re: INTIMIDATION OR NOT" on 23:51:21 01/06/13 Sun

Who goes to the Court of Appeals, when the Defendant is in jail, and then pounds his chest and states I will not be intimidated? Who was there to view the empty chest thumping? Come on!!! Humphrey portrays himself as some defender of the judiciary when the whole deal with Brewington was a farce. This entire charade is pure jerkwater logic and justice. Humphrey was standing up, he was attempting to sway the Justices on the Court of Appeals that "Oh there is Judge Humphrey!!! Hopefully justice is not denied in this case because Humphrey was attempting to throw his weight around. It works in Dearborn County do to the simply sheep that reside here. Maybe the Court of Appeals is different.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]