Re: Anti Marijuana piece from federal prosecutor -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Anti Marijuana piece from federal prosecutor

Author:
Anon.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:54:25 01/17/13 Thu
In reply to: first offenses 's message, "Re: Anti Marijuana piece from federal prosecutor" on 07:50:51 01/17/13 Thu

I would like to see them use police time and court resources more wisely and ignore pot laws (unless concurrent crime necessitates action). If they can't do that with the laws on the books, maybe it should be legalized or be minor like a parking ticket.
Many professions don't allow prescriptions drugs of most types either. They screen to prevent use of prescription drugs, and illegal drug use (alcohol too). These regulations would likely continue as same even if pot were legal and would work just the same as it does now.
Many sensitive professions don't screen at all. A surgeon is not required to be tested and same in many other areas. No solution is perfect.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]