Re: Continued Support for Free Speech -- Dearborn County Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: Continued Support for Free Speech

Author:
Matt Brewington

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:34:09 02/03/13 Sun
In reply to: theotherside 's message, "Re: Continued Support for Free Speech" on 20:01:17 02/02/13 Sat

to theotherside- They really want you to believe that. The truth is that Dan tried to get a court approved evaluator (after he publicly criticized the Dearborn County Court System) and Judge James D. Humphrey set a hearing on the matter for three months down the road. Then, just a week before that hearing was to take place, Humphrey recused himself citing an on-going ten month investigation. So, in review, Humphrey sat in judgment of a man, ruling on motions and setting hearing dates, all while being "intimidated" by that man. Everyone can easily see how unethical and immoral the judge's behavior has been. Humphrey and his buddy, Prosecutor F. Aaron Negangard, are not afraid of Dan Brewington. What they are afraid of is someone standing up to the behavior of some unethical (at best) public officials in Dearborn County. The sad reality is that Judge James D. Humphrey held two little girls hostage from their father and used them as pawns in a game to punish their father for not properly respecting the all mighty Dearborn County family court judge. Remember, Humphrey was presented with no evidence in the divorce hearings for taking a father away from two small children; no criminal history, no abuse, no neglect, no drugs or alcohol, only "courtroom behavior". Courtroom behavior that didn't even warrant a contempt charge. As a matter of fact, the judge left the children in the care of their father (equal with the mother) for over two months after the final hearing; same as it had been for two and a half years prior to that. So did the good judge leave two small children in the care of a "dangerous" man after the final hearing?... I think it's pretty clear what happened. Judge Humphrey's actions were mentally abusive to two small children. And when Dan Brewington took to the internet to call Judge Humphrey a child abuser for his inexplicable actions, they trumped up some phony internal fear and sent him to prison.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Continued Support for Free Speech	To add to Matt Brewington comments	09:38:35 02/06/13 Wed